Skip to content

feat(t8s-cluster/management-cluster): ignore local storage for autoscaler#1973

Merged
cwrau merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/t8s-cluster/autoscaler-ignore-local-storage
Feb 9, 2026
Merged

feat(t8s-cluster/management-cluster): ignore local storage for autoscaler#1973
cwrau merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/t8s-cluster/autoscaler-ignore-local-storage

Conversation

@cwrau
Copy link
Member

@cwrau cwrau commented Feb 5, 2026

They can be removed indiscriminately

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated cluster autoscaler configuration to consider nodes with local storage when making scaling decisions, improving resource optimization during cluster scaling operations.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 5, 2026 14:36
@cwrau cwrau requested a review from teutonet-bot as a code owner February 5, 2026 14:36
@cwrau cwrau enabled auto-merge February 5, 2026 14:36
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @cwrau, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request modifies the configuration of the cluster autoscaler for the t8s-cluster management cluster. The change ensures that nodes with local storage are properly evaluated for scaling down, preventing them from being inadvertently excluded from the autoscaling process and allowing for more efficient resource management.

Highlights

  • Autoscaler Configuration: The skip-nodes-with-local-storage argument has been explicitly set to false within the cluster autoscaler's extraArgs. This configuration ensures that nodes equipped with local storage are not ignored during autoscaling operations, allowing them to be considered for scaling down.
Changelog
  • charts/t8s-cluster/templates/management-cluster/autoscaler.yaml
    • Added the skip-nodes-with-local-storage: false argument to the autoscaler's extraArgs section. This explicitly configures the autoscaler to not skip nodes that have local storage when making scaling decisions.
Activity
  • No specific activity (comments, reviews, or progress updates) has been recorded for this pull request yet.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 5, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A single configuration parameter is added to the cluster autoscaler Helm template, setting skip-nodes-with-local-storage to false. This prevents the autoscaler from skipping nodes that have local storage attached.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Cluster Autoscaler Configuration
charts/t8s-cluster/templates/management-cluster/autoscaler.yaml
Added skip-nodes-with-local-storage: false extraArg to cluster autoscaler configuration, enabling autoscaling for nodes with local storage.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

t8s-cluster

Suggested reviewers

  • tasches
  • marvinWolff
  • teutonet-bot

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 A single flag hops into place,
Local storage nodes find grace,
The autoscaler learns to care,
For data on nodes everywhere! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: adding skip-nodes-with-local-storage: false to the autoscaler configuration, allowing it to ignore local storage constraints.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/t8s-cluster/autoscaler-ignore-local-storage

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request configures the cluster-autoscaler to allow scaling down nodes that have pods with local storage by setting skip-nodes-with-local-storage to false. While this may be the intended behavior for a specific use case, hardcoding this value in a reusable chart is risky as it can lead to unexpected data loss for other users. My review suggests making this setting configurable via values.yaml and defaulting to the safer option (true) to prevent accidents.

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR configures the cluster autoscaler to allow removal of nodes with local storage by setting skip-nodes-with-local-storage: false. This changes the autoscaler's default behavior to permit aggressive scale-down operations even when pods have emptyDir or hostPath volumes.

Changes:

  • Added skip-nodes-with-local-storage: false configuration to the cluster autoscaler extraArgs

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@cwrau cwrau added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 9, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit d4abff8 Feb 9, 2026
39 checks passed
@cwrau cwrau deleted the feat/t8s-cluster/autoscaler-ignore-local-storage branch February 9, 2026 14:12
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2026
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[9.6.0](t8s-cluster-v9.5.2...t8s-cluster-v9.6.0)
(2026-02-25)


### Features

* **t8s-cluster/management-cluster:** add `compute-plane` role label to
nodes
([#1953](#1953))
([f5897e3](f5897e3))
* **t8s-cluster/management-cluster:** add quotas fied to cluster
([#1998](#1998))
([3123514](3123514))
* **t8s-cluster/management-cluster:** ignore local storage for
autoscaler
([#1973](#1973))
([d4abff8](d4abff8))


### Bug Fixes

* **t8s-cluster/management-cluster:** add missing securityGroupRule for
cilium hubble
([#1971](#1971))
([f36f231](f36f231))
* **t8s-cluster/management-cluster:** adjust test helmRepositories
([#1964](#1964))
([66be444](66be444))
* **t8s-cluster/management-cluster:** remove hardcoded field
([#1984](#1984))
([227af97](227af97))
* **t8s-cluster/workload-cluster:** add missing tolerations
([#1933](#1933))
([8718c0d](8718c0d))
* **t8s-cluster/workload-cluster:** correctly set extraArgs value
([#2003](#2003))
([6e558f0](6e558f0))
* **t8s-cluster/workload-cluster:** migrate extraArgs type to string
([#1985](#1985))
([79d6df5](79d6df5))


### Miscellaneous Chores

* **t8s-cluster/dependencies:** update common docker tag to v1.8.0
([#1940](#1940))
([cdf387f](cdf387f))
* **t8s-cluster/dependencies:** update helm release cilium to v1.19.0
([#1969](#1969))
([e95a9a5](e95a9a5))
* **t8s-cluster/dependencies:** update helm release cluster-autoscaler
to v9.55.0
([#1963](#1963))
([659a529](659a529))
* **t8s-cluster/dependencies:** update helm release openstack-cinder-csi
to v2.35.0
([#1970](#1970))
([741d5b2](741d5b2))
* **t8s-cluster/dependencies:** update helm release
openstack-cloud-controller-manager to v2.35.0
([#1941](#1941))
([a580142](a580142))
* **t8s-cluster/dependencies:** update registry.k8s.io/etcd docker tag
to v3.6.8
([#1996](#1996))
([aa7d054](aa7d054))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

---------

Co-authored-by: github-actions <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants