skip test_bgp_slb advanced reboot for isolated topo#17470
Merged
StormLiangMS merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom Mar 19, 2025
Merged
skip test_bgp_slb advanced reboot for isolated topo#17470StormLiangMS merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
StormLiangMS merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
Conversation
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines will not run the associated pipelines, because the pull request was updated after the run command was issued. Review the pull request again and issue a new run command. |
Contributor
Author
|
Test result: |
Collaborator
|
/azp run Azure.sonic-mgmt |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Contributor
Author
|
/azpw run |
Collaborator
|
/AzurePipelines run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Contributor
Author
|
the PR pipeline failure is a known issue: #17427 |
Closed
11 tasks
mssonicbld
pushed a commit
to mssonicbld/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2025
What is the motivation for this PR? 'isolated' topology doesn't support warm/fast reboot. skip the test case. How did you do it? skip it. How did you verify/test it? verified on physical testbed.
Collaborator
|
Cherry-pick PR to 202411: #17605 |
Collaborator
|
Cherry-pick PR to msft-202412: Azure/sonic-mgmt.msft#157 |
11 tasks
Collaborator
|
already tagged to 202411, removing 202412 tag and closing PR to avoid future merge conflict. |
amulyan7
pushed a commit
to amulyan7/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2025
What is the motivation for this PR? 'isolated' topology doesn't support warm/fast reboot. skip the test case. How did you do it? skip it. How did you verify/test it? verified on physical testbed.
OriTrabelsi
pushed a commit
to OriTrabelsi/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 1, 2025
What is the motivation for this PR? 'isolated' topology doesn't support warm/fast reboot. skip the test case. How did you do it? skip it. How did you verify/test it? verified on physical testbed.
mssonicbld
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2025
What is the motivation for this PR? 'isolated' topology doesn't support warm/fast reboot. skip the test case. How did you do it? skip it. How did you verify/test it? verified on physical testbed.
mssonicbld
added
Included in 202411 branch
and removed
Created PR to 202411 branch
labels
auspham
pushed a commit
to auspham/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2025
Code sync sonic-net/sonic-mgmt:202411 => 202503 ``` * 6b59eaa (HEAD -> sync/202503, origin/sync/202503) Merge remote-tracking branch 'pub_upstream/202411' into sync/202503 |\ | * c6a94a0 (pub_upstream/202411) Revert "[dualtor_io] Allow duplications for link down downstream I/O (sonic-net#17909)" (sonic-net#18192) | * de454d5 [testARPCompleted] Cleanup ptf ip after test failure (sonic-net#18170) | * 4a3d1d9 [dualtor] Refine `fdb_mac_learning_test.py` (sonic-net#18092) | * 5964a78 [dualtor_io] Fix the start marker not found issue (sonic-net#18096) | * ce40816 Extend LACP time multiplier for advanced-reboot tests with cEOS peers (sonic-net#17964) | * 0e70ba3 adjust port selection in case testQosSaiXonHysteresis for Cisco-8101 (sonic-net#18130) | * 8bb7203 [202411] Restore disable packet aging fixture 202411 (sonic-net#18103) | * 8f6d1a3 Filter out Not Applicable values in command line (sonic-net#18006) | * 9d5de5c Backport t0-118 test configs to 202411 (sonic-net#17983) | * e758401 mark xfail on generic hash test for isolated topo (sonic-net#18071) | * c65ceab [202411][dualtor] Skip pfcwd warm reboot on dualtor (sonic-net#18072) | * c509006 Improve disabling packet aging to support swap_syncd (sonic-net#17728) (sonic-net#17739) | * 9dc2244 [202411][dualtor-aa] Fix test_arp_dualtor on active-active dualtor (sonic-net#18073) | * cf12a33 fixed tacacs duplicate user issue (sonic-net#18068) | * 330a893 Fix telemetry/test_events.py for dualtor (sonic-net#18025) | * dc6fee8 Remove admin down ports in BUFFER PG check logic (sonic-net#17505) | * 805d538 Update generic hash test to support dualtor active active topology (sonic-net#16217) | * 7c31e46 [dualtor_io] Allow duplications for link down downstream I/O (sonic-net#17909) | * a7f50c6 Fix vlan vs router mac issue with test_qos_dscp_mapping.py (sonic-net#17846) (sonic-net#18003) | * 9ab1e7a Skip test_incremental_qos on Mellanox dualtor (sonic-net#17406) (sonic-net#18048) | * f42afd0 Force eos default creds to be string (sonic-net#18026) | * be542b0 Restore config after vxlan_crm from vxlan_ecmp. (sonic-net#17767) | * f0718b9 [Fix for Issue sonic-net#17413] Modified the Tx Rx port id list selection for all to all scenario (sonic-net#17919) | * 3eb4ed4 [dualtor_io] Collect syslog to debug (sonic-net#17722) | * d5bd995 Disable PFC-WD during PCBB and some wmk test improvements (sonic-net#17889) | * 2f512aa Update outer UDP sport range to exclude port 53 (sonic-net#17570) (sonic-net#17798) | * 980b373 skip test_bgp_slb advanced reboot for isolated topo (sonic-net#17470) | * 408bf9e Default the inner dscp to outer dscp map to be 1-1. (sonic-net#17860) | * 37495a1 Add dualtor fixtures to no_traffic test. (sonic-net#17916) | * a13b599 Only print the matched syslog in loganalzyer teardown check, no traceback info printed (sonic-net#17926) | * 6127f29 Revert "Skip test_vnet_decap on Cisco-8000 with 202411 (sonic-net#17776)" (sonic-net#17941) (sonic-net#17942) | * 60274db Increase timeout to 5 in verify_packet_any_port for background traffic (sonic-net#17904) ```
opcoder0
pushed a commit
to opcoder0/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2025
What is the motivation for this PR? 'isolated' topology doesn't support warm/fast reboot. skip the test case. How did you do it? skip it. How did you verify/test it? verified on physical testbed. Signed-off-by: opcoder0 <110003254+opcoder0@users.noreply.github.com>
gshemesh2
pushed a commit
to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2025
What is the motivation for this PR? 'isolated' topology doesn't support warm/fast reboot. skip the test case. How did you do it? skip it. How did you verify/test it? verified on physical testbed. Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <gshemesh@nvidia.com>
gshemesh2
pushed a commit
to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2026
What is the motivation for this PR? 'isolated' topology doesn't support warm/fast reboot. skip the test case. How did you do it? skip it. How did you verify/test it? verified on physical testbed. Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <gshemesh@nvidia.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of PR
Summary:
'isolated' topology doesn't support warm/fast reboot. skip the test case.
Type of change
Back port request
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
'isolated' topology doesn't support warm/fast reboot. skip the test case.
How did you do it?
skip it.
How did you verify/test it?
verified on physical testbed.
Any platform specific information?
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
Documentation