PIM candidate BSR/RP support#16438
Conversation
1392c5a to
511528d
Compare
|
Ran the test and got this new memory leaks: My expectation is that we should not be adding new code that leaks |
will fix. |
d63c2e9 to
bbcfe38
Compare
nabahr
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just a few minor comments
pimd/pim6_cmd.c
Outdated
| event_timer_remain_msec( | ||
| scope->cand_rp_adv_timer)); | ||
|
|
||
| vty_out(vty, "%s\n", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You can use "vty_json" instead of vty_out and json_object_free()
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why was this resolved? I started to write a comment about this as well, I see that vty_json is not being used in several spots
|
Working on addressing comments from @nabahr and @mobash-rasool |
5d3d1b7 to
0158267
Compare
pimd/pim6_cmd.c
Outdated
| vty_out(vty, "{}\n"); | ||
| else | ||
| vty_out(vty, | ||
| "This router is not currently operating as Candidate RP\n"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I suggest adding this also to JSON output, e.g.:
{"warning": "..."}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This isn't a warning really, just informational.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I.e, the correct behavior it return an empty object.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Neither agree, nor disagree, e.g. we have in BGP such patterns:
if (!peer) {
if (use_json) {
json_object *json_no = NULL;
json_no = json_object_new_object();
json_object_string_add(json_no, "warning",
"No such neighbor in this view/vrf");
vty_json(vty, json_no);
} else
vty_out(vty, "No such neighbor in this view/vrf\n");
return NULL;
}or
if (is_synchronized(rpki_vrf)) {
if (strmatch(prefixkind, "prefix-count"))
print_prefix_table(vty, rpki_vrf, json, true);
else
print_prefix_table(vty, rpki_vrf, json, false);
} else {
if (json) {
json_object_string_add(json, "error", "No Connection to RPKI cache server.");
vty_json(vty, json);
} else
vty_out(vty, "No connection to RPKI cache server.\n");
return CMD_WARNING;
}Anyway, it's not a blocker. Just an improvement.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Both of these are a bit different. The first , if you query a neighbor that doesn't exist, a warning is a good idea about it. The second case is an error, so that does need an error return. So I see why those have them. The case I have is purely informational.
0158267 to
2906368
Compare
|
I addressed all comments on this PR. |
322cda5 to
073c6d5
Compare
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org> Signed-off-by: Jafar Al-Gharaibeh <jafar@atcorp.com>
073c6d5 to
0e5aa6e
Compare
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org> Signed-off-by: Jafar Al-Gharaibeh <jafar@atcorp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jafar Al-Gharaibeh <jafar@atcorp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jafar Al-Gharaibeh <jafar@atcorp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jafar Al-Gharaibeh <jafar@atcorp.com>
0e5aa6e to
93cfd9a
Compare
Signed-off-by: Jafar Al-Gharaibeh <jafar@atcorp.com>
This change re-adds an additional check bsr rpf that was removed in 2c6a32f. Without that check, bsr messages is resent (causing a loop) if we have more than one pim neighbor on a link. Signed-off-by: Jafar Al-Gharaibeh <jafar@atcorp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jafar Al-Gharaibeh <jafar@atcorp.com>
93cfd9a to
571108e
Compare
New Features Highlight: - PIM candidate BSR/RP [#16438] - Static IGMP join without an IGMP report [1#6450] - PIM AutoRP discovery/announcements [#16634] - IGMP proxy [#16861] - SRv6 SID Manager [#15604] - Add `bgp ipv6-auto-ra` command [#16354] - Implement `neighbor x remote-as auto` for BGP [#16345] - Implement `bgp dual-as` for BGP [#16816] - Implement BGP-wide configuration for graceful restart [#16099] - Handle kernel routes appropriately (should fix recent NOPREFIXROUTE issue) [#16300] - Add `cisco-authentication` password support for NHRP [#16172] Signed-off-by: Jafar Al-Gharaibeh <jafar@atcorp.com>
This Brings full BSR and RP candidate support to FRR (rfc 5059)
Replaces #9180 , in coordination with @eqvinox