Skip to content

Skip warm-reboot part in qos/test_qos_dscp_mapping.py for dualtor topologies#21820

Merged
StormLiangMS merged 7 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom
rajkumar1-arista:skip-warm-reboot-part-in-test-qos-dscp-mapping-for-dualtor
Feb 25, 2026
Merged

Skip warm-reboot part in qos/test_qos_dscp_mapping.py for dualtor topologies#21820
StormLiangMS merged 7 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom
rajkumar1-arista:skip-warm-reboot-part-in-test-qos-dscp-mapping-for-dualtor

Conversation

@rajkumar1-arista
Copy link
Contributor

Description of PR

Skip warm-reboot and re-running test qos/test_qos_dscp_mapping.py::TestQoSSaiDSCPQueueMapping_IPIP_Base::test_dscp_to_queue_mapping after warm-reboot as its broken in dualtor

Summary:
Fixes # (https://github.com/aristanetworks/sonic-qual.msft/issues/1010)

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • New Test case
    • Skipped for non-supported platforms
  • Test case improvement

Back port request

  • 202205
  • 202305
  • 202311
  • 202405
  • 202411
  • 202505
  • 202511

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

This test triggers warm reboot which is broken on dualtor and can cause orchagent crash etc.

How did you do it?

Skipping the warm-reboot part of the test for dualtor

How did you verify/test it?

ran the test

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

…QueueMapping_IPIP_Base::test_dscp_to_queue_mapping for dualtor

Skipping warm-reboot and re-running test after that as warm-reboot is broken in dualtor topologies

Signed-off-by: rajkumar1 <rajkumar1@arista.com>
@rajkumar1-arista rajkumar1-arista force-pushed the skip-warm-reboot-part-in-test-qos-dscp-mapping-for-dualtor branch from 8aad6a3 to c7e6834 Compare January 5, 2026 12:51
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@rajkumar1-arista
Copy link
Contributor Author

@StormLiangMS @xwjiang-ms can you please review this change?

@rajkumar1-arista
Copy link
Contributor Author

@StormLiangMS, @XuChen-MSFT can you please take a look?

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

Signed-off-by: rajkumar1 <rajkumar1@arista.com>
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

Signed-off-by: rajkumar1 <rajkumar1@arista.com>
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

Signed-off-by: rajkumar1 <rajkumar1@arista.com>
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

Signed-off-by: rajkumar1 <rajkumar1@arista.com>
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

Signed-off-by: rajkumar1 <rajkumar1@arista.com>
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

Copy link
Collaborator

@lolyu lolyu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggest using the conditional mark to skip the case.

@rajkumar1-arista
Copy link
Contributor Author

suggest using the conditional mark to skip the case.

Testing up until the warm reboot point is still valid for these topologies.

Copy link
Collaborator

@StormLiangMS StormLiangMS left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@StormLiangMS StormLiangMS merged commit 458bb10 into sonic-net:master Feb 25, 2026
19 checks passed
@StormLiangMS StormLiangMS added Request for 202511 branch Request to backport a change to 202511 branch Approved for 202511 branch labels Feb 25, 2026
mssonicbld pushed a commit to mssonicbld/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2026
…opologies (sonic-net#21820)

What is the motivation for this PR?
This test triggers warm reboot which is broken on dualtor and can cause orchagent crash etc.

How did you do it?
Skipping the warm-reboot part of the test for dualtor

How did you verify/test it?
ran the test

Signed-off-by: mssonicbld <sonicbld@microsoft.com>
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

Cherry-pick PR to 202511: #22614

mssonicbld pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2026
…opologies (#21820)

What is the motivation for this PR?
This test triggers warm reboot which is broken on dualtor and can cause orchagent crash etc.

How did you do it?
Skipping the warm-reboot part of the test for dualtor

How did you verify/test it?
ran the test

Signed-off-by: mssonicbld <sonicbld@microsoft.com>
aronovic pushed a commit to aronovic/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2026
…opologies (sonic-net#21820)

What is the motivation for this PR?
This test triggers warm reboot which is broken on dualtor and can cause orchagent crash etc.

How did you do it?
Skipping the warm-reboot part of the test for dualtor

How did you verify/test it?
ran the test

Signed-off-by: Mihut Aronovici <aronovic@cisco.com>
rraghav-cisco pushed a commit to rraghav-cisco/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2026
…opologies (sonic-net#21820)

What is the motivation for this PR?
This test triggers warm reboot which is broken on dualtor and can cause orchagent crash etc.

How did you do it?
Skipping the warm-reboot part of the test for dualtor

How did you verify/test it?
ran the test

Signed-off-by: Raghavendran Ramanathan <rraghav@cisco.com>
kazinator-arista pushed a commit to kazinator-arista/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2026
…tically (sonic-net#21820)

#### Why I did it
src/sonic-sairedis
```
* d884ff9a - (HEAD -> 202411, origin/202411) [syncd] Move logSet logGet under mutex to prevent race condition (sonic-net#1520) (sonic-net#1538) (3 hours ago) [Kamil Cudnik]
```
#### How I did it
#### How to verify it
#### Description for the changelog
abhishek-nexthop pushed a commit to nexthop-ai/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2026
…opologies (sonic-net#21820)

What is the motivation for this PR?
This test triggers warm reboot which is broken on dualtor and can cause orchagent crash etc.

How did you do it?
Skipping the warm-reboot part of the test for dualtor

How did you verify/test it?
ran the test

Signed-off-by: Abhishek <abhishek@nexthop.ai>
vrajeshe pushed a commit to vrajeshe/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2026
…opologies (sonic-net#21820)

What is the motivation for this PR?
This test triggers warm reboot which is broken on dualtor and can cause orchagent crash etc.

How did you do it?
Skipping the warm-reboot part of the test for dualtor

How did you verify/test it?
ran the test

Signed-off-by: Venkata Gouri Rajesh Etla <vrajeshe@cisco.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants