Skip multi-hop upgrade tests on non-T0 testbeds [cherry-pick to 202411]#19326
Merged
StormLiangMS merged 1 commit intosonic-net:202411from Jul 9, 2025
Conversation
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
What is the motivation for this PR? Skip running tests on topologies that don't support it causing redundant test runs. How did you do it? Added a check to skip the test on non-T0 testbeds. How did you verify/test it? Any platform specific information? Only run it on t0 testbeds from now on.
Ryangwaite
force-pushed
the
skip-multi-hop-test-on-non-t0-topos-for-202411
branch
from
1e70ed0 to
711091d
Compare
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
sdszhang
pushed a commit
to sdszhang/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 2, 2025
Code sync sonic-net/sonic-mgmt:202411 => 202412 ``` * 3124d52 (HEAD -> code-sync-202412, origin/code-sync-202412) r12f 250710:1626 - Merge remote-tracking branch 'base/202411' into code-sync-202412 |\ | * b1b95dc (base/202411) zitingguo-ms 250513:1848 - Fix PortChannel name matching in verify_attr_change to handle leading spaces (sonic-net#18301) | * 7461bf3 wrideout-arista 250604:1542 - Determine if the eos switch is running in multiagent mode, and stop/start the (sonic-net#18748) | * 4346afd Dashuai Zhang 250411:0103 - update d18u8s4 PT0 ASN to 4 bytes (sonic-net#17888) | * de1b1b4 Ryangwaite 250709:1028 - Skip multi-hop upgrade tests on non-T0 testbeds (sonic-net#19078) (sonic-net#19326) | * 573d42d Cong Hou 250709:0232 - Update the skip for test test_qos_dscp_mapping.py (sonic-net#19381) | * 3eb65b9 Yawen 250708:1743 - Unskip test_qos_sai for dualtor-aa-64-breakout (sonic-net#19363) | * f0c9705 Cong Hou 250707:2351 - xfail generic hash test on dualtor (sonic-net#19383) | * d378110 eyakubch 250707:0546 - Reduce flakiness of test_l2_configure.py. (sonic-net#18831) | * 043dba8 ShiyanWangMS 250703:0935 - Fix the ignore pattern - leapsecond file expired warning (sonic-net#19332) | * 92af38f zitingguo-ms 250703:1958 - Unskip testQosSaiHeadroomPoolWatermark on t0-d18u8s4 (sonic-net#19287) (sonic-net#19342) | * 0b7e4de Chuan Wu 250704:0334 - Add background traffic for test_pfc_pause_extra_lossless test (sonic-net#19218) ```
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Manual cherry-pick of #19078 to 202411 due to conflicts
What is the motivation for this PR?
Skip running tests on topologies that don't support it causing redundant test runs.
How did you do it?
Added a check to skip the test on non-T0 testbeds.
How did you verify/test it?
Any platform specific information?
Only run it on t0 testbeds from now on.
Description of PR
Summary:
Fixes # (issue)
Type of change
Back port request
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
How did you do it?
How did you verify/test it?
Any platform specific information?
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
Documentation