Add snmp lldp state check after config_reload#18805
Merged
yxieca merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom Jun 5, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
r12f
approved these changes
Jun 5, 2025
mssonicbld
pushed a commit
to mssonicbld/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2025
What is the motivation for this PR? The next test fails because SNMP LLDP is not ready (fails on KeyError because SNMP LLDP entries are not populated properly from snmpwalk). How did you do it? Ensure SNMP LLDP is ready after config reload before proceeding to the next test. How did you verify/test it? snmp/test_snmp_lldp.py no longer fails when run right after snmp/test_snmp_link_local.py
Collaborator
|
Cherry-pick PR to 202411: #18819 |
This was referenced Jun 5, 2025
Collaborator
|
Cherry-pick PR to msft-202412: Azure/sonic-mgmt.msft#367 |
mssonicbld
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2025
What is the motivation for this PR? The next test fails because SNMP LLDP is not ready (fails on KeyError because SNMP LLDP entries are not populated properly from snmpwalk). How did you do it? Ensure SNMP LLDP is ready after config reload before proceeding to the next test. How did you verify/test it? snmp/test_snmp_lldp.py no longer fails when run right after snmp/test_snmp_link_local.py
mssonicbld
pushed a commit
to mssonicbld/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 6, 2025
What is the motivation for this PR? The next test fails because SNMP LLDP is not ready (fails on KeyError because SNMP LLDP entries are not populated properly from snmpwalk). How did you do it? Ensure SNMP LLDP is ready after config reload before proceeding to the next test. How did you verify/test it? snmp/test_snmp_lldp.py no longer fails when run right after snmp/test_snmp_link_local.py
Collaborator
|
Cherry-pick PR to 202505: #18845 |
11 tasks
mssonicbld
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 6, 2025
What is the motivation for this PR? The next test fails because SNMP LLDP is not ready (fails on KeyError because SNMP LLDP entries are not populated properly from snmpwalk). How did you do it? Ensure SNMP LLDP is ready after config reload before proceeding to the next test. How did you verify/test it? snmp/test_snmp_lldp.py no longer fails when run right after snmp/test_snmp_link_local.py
mssonicbld
added
Included in 202505 branch
and removed
Created PR to 202505 branch
labels
sdszhang
pushed a commit
to sdszhang/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 14, 2025
Code sync sonic-net/sonic-mgmt:202411 => 202412 ``` * 1f86dab (HEAD -> code-sync-202412, origin/code-sync-202412) r12f 250610:2314 - Merge remote-tracking branch 'base/202411' into code-sync-202412 |\ | * 2ba104e (base/202411) xwjiang-ms 250610:1604 - [202411] Use ceos 4.32.5M as default ceos image version (sonic-net#18878) | * 5fa5cda Longxiang Lyu 250610:0818 - [202411][dualtor-aa] Add `dualtor_aa` support to `test_nvgre_hash` (sonic-net#18883) | * afecbbf zitingguo-ms 250609:1334 - [Cherry-pick][ACL] Collect all upstream ports and Include service port into upstream neighbors in ACL tests (sonic-net#18847) | * 2e4247b pragnya-arista 250609:0632 - [202411][sonic-mgmt]Fix decap/test_subnet_decap.py::test_vlan_subnet_decap (sonic-net#18778) | * 0bfc7a8 Longxiang Lyu 250606:0943 - [dualtor-io] Fix duplication merge condition (sonic-net#18828) | * 52d3771 Zhaohui Sun 250605:2046 - Restore configuration after vxlan module (sonic-net#18714) | * 3d0922f Yaqiang Zhu 250605:2259 - [202411][pktgen] Skip test_pktgen in m0/mx/m1 (sonic-net#18822) | * 3de20a6 Zhaohui Sun 250516:1325 - Add secondary subnet config for t0 topologies (sonic-net#18399) | * bb3e0f9 Zhaohui Sun 250605:1416 - Xfail test_dir_bcast.py due to known issue on Broadcom platform (sonic-net#18787) | * 158c562 Justin Wong 250604:2058 - Add snmp lldp state check after config_reload (sonic-net#18805) | * e39c891 eyakubch 250605:0415 - bug: added fast reboot into reboot_type check (sonic-net#18551) | * 8c7dd3b Cong Hou 250604:1433 - Remove the skip/xfail for the dualtor_io link failure test (sonic-net#18712) | * 5dbc53d mssonicbld 250604:0952 - [dualtor-io] fix dualtor sniffer start slow issue (sonic-net#18758) (sonic-net#18776) | * 105cdf6 StormLiangMS 250603:0844 - [CRM AVAILABLE] To enhance the crm tests for TD3 and Cisco devices (sonic-net#18733) | * 4251b38 andywongarista 250601:1828 - Add restore_image fixture to test_multi_hop_upgrade_path (sonic-net#18230) (sonic-net#18532) | * 85a55d8 Longxiang Lyu 250528:2313 - [dualtor] Fix `test_orchagent_slb` (sonic-net#18666) | * 95a8764 Vivek Verma 250227:0656 - Fix fixture invocation order in qos_sai_base.py to prevent teardown failure. (sonic-net#17180) | * 9a72265 Justin Wong 250514:1844 - Add PTF parameter for ceos neighbor lacp multiplier (sonic-net#18215) | * cd1375d Longxiang Lyu 250529:1029 - [dualtor-io] Validate and recover active-active setup (sonic-net#18675) | * 763c1b3 Longxiang Lyu 250528:2314 - [dualtor] Fix loganalyzer not exist issue (sonic-net#18674) ```
opcoder0
pushed a commit
to opcoder0/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2025
What is the motivation for this PR? The next test fails because SNMP LLDP is not ready (fails on KeyError because SNMP LLDP entries are not populated properly from snmpwalk). How did you do it? Ensure SNMP LLDP is ready after config reload before proceeding to the next test. How did you verify/test it? snmp/test_snmp_lldp.py no longer fails when run right after snmp/test_snmp_link_local.py Signed-off-by: opcoder0 <[email protected]>
AharonMalkin
pushed a commit
to AharonMalkin/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2025
What is the motivation for this PR? The next test fails because SNMP LLDP is not ready (fails on KeyError because SNMP LLDP entries are not populated properly from snmpwalk). How did you do it? Ensure SNMP LLDP is ready after config reload before proceeding to the next test. How did you verify/test it? snmp/test_snmp_lldp.py no longer fails when run right after snmp/test_snmp_link_local.py Signed-off-by: Aharon Malkin <[email protected]>
gshemesh2
pushed a commit
to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2025
What is the motivation for this PR? The next test fails because SNMP LLDP is not ready (fails on KeyError because SNMP LLDP entries are not populated properly from snmpwalk). How did you do it? Ensure SNMP LLDP is ready after config reload before proceeding to the next test. How did you verify/test it? snmp/test_snmp_lldp.py no longer fails when run right after snmp/test_snmp_link_local.py Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <[email protected]>
venu-nexthop
pushed a commit
to venu-nexthop/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2026
What is the motivation for this PR? The next test fails because SNMP LLDP is not ready (fails on KeyError because SNMP LLDP entries are not populated properly from snmpwalk). How did you do it? Ensure SNMP LLDP is ready after config reload before proceeding to the next test. How did you verify/test it? snmp/test_snmp_lldp.py no longer fails when run right after snmp/test_snmp_link_local.py
gshemesh2
pushed a commit
to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2026
What is the motivation for this PR? The next test fails because SNMP LLDP is not ready (fails on KeyError because SNMP LLDP entries are not populated properly from snmpwalk). How did you do it? Ensure SNMP LLDP is ready after config reload before proceeding to the next test. How did you verify/test it? snmp/test_snmp_lldp.py no longer fails when run right after snmp/test_snmp_link_local.py Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <[email protected]>
ytzur1
pushed a commit
to ytzur1/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 2, 2026
What is the motivation for this PR? The next test fails because SNMP LLDP is not ready (fails on KeyError because SNMP LLDP entries are not populated properly from snmpwalk). How did you do it? Ensure SNMP LLDP is ready after config reload before proceeding to the next test. How did you verify/test it? snmp/test_snmp_lldp.py no longer fails when run right after snmp/test_snmp_link_local.py Signed-off-by: Yael Tzur <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of PR
Summary:
Add SNMP LLDP check after config reload in test cleanup
SNMP LLDP takes a bit longer to be ready after
config reload. Ensure that it is ready before proceeding to the next test (snmp/test_snmp_lldp.py).Fixes # (issue)
Type of change
Back port request
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
The next test fails because SNMP LLDP is not ready (fails on
KeyErrorbecause SNMP LLDP entries are not populated properly from snmpwalk).How did you do it?
Ensure SNMP LLDP is ready after
config reloadbefore proceeding to the next test.How did you verify/test it?
snmp/test_snmp_lldp.pyno longer fails when run right aftersnmp/test_snmp_link_local.py.Any platform specific information?
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
Documentation