Skip to content

Add support for test_power_off_reboot for Cisco 8808 chassis#16736

Merged
yejianquan merged 2 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom
vperumal:power_off_reboot_cisco
Jan 31, 2025
Merged

Add support for test_power_off_reboot for Cisco 8808 chassis#16736
yejianquan merged 2 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom
vperumal:power_off_reboot_cisco

Conversation

@vperumal
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Description of PR

Add support for test_power_off_reboot for Cisco 8808 chassis. For chassis, till we can add calculation to find minimum number of PSU up based on the load of the system, we will bringup all the PSU before we continue the test.

Summary:
Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • New Test case
    • Skipped for non-supported platforms
  • Test case improvement

Back port request

  • 202012
  • 202205
  • 202305
  • 202311
  • 202405
  • 202411

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

Add support for test_power_off_reboot for Cisco 8808 chassis. For chassis, till we can add calculation to find minimum number of PSU up based on the load of the system, we will bringup all the PSU before we continue the test.

How did you do it?

How did you verify/test it?

On T2 profiles

Any platform specific information?

Cisco 8808 chassis

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

=========================================================================================== PASSES ===========================================================================================
______________________________________________________________________________ test_power_off_reboot[5-yy39-rp] ______________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________ test_power_off_reboot[15-yy39-rp] ______________________________________________________________________________
------------------------------------------ generated xml file: /run_logs/20590_nightly/platform_tests/test_power_off_reboot_2025-01-30-22-08-39.xml ------------------------------------------
================================================================================== short test summary info ===================================================================================
PASSED platform_tests/test_power_off_reboot.py::test_power_off_reboot[5-yy39-rp]
PASSED platform_tests/test_power_off_reboot.py::test_power_off_reboot[15-yy39-rp]
========================================================================= 2 passed, 1 warning in 2467.92s (0:41:07) ==========================================================================

@vperumal vperumal requested a review from prgeor as a code owner January 31, 2025 00:31
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@vperumal
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

FYI @abdosi @yejianquan

@yejianquan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Hi @vperumal , please fix the static check failures

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@vperumal
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Fixed @yejianquan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@yejianquan yejianquan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@vperumal PR conflicts with 202411 branch

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Cherry-pick PR to msft-202405: Azure/sonic-mgmt.msft#47

yejianquan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2025
…2 devices get test_power_off_reboot.py fix (#16899)

Description of PR
Summary:
Fixes #16898

Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
PR #16736 reintroduces bug that we previously fixed in #16313 by making it only applying it to Cisco chassis.

How did you do it?
Let duthosts be passed to reboot_and_check for all T2/chassis devices

How did you verify/test it?
Run on non Cisco T2 device
Signed-off-by: Javier Tan javiertan@microsoft.com
mssonicbld added a commit to mssonicbld/sonic-mgmt.msft that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2025
<!--
Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines;
https://github.com/sonic-net/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md

Please provide following information to help code review process a bit easier:
-->
### Description of PR
<!--
- Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed.
- Please also include relevant motivation and context. Where should reviewer start? background context?
- List any dependencies that are required for this change.
-->

Summary:
Fixes #16898

### Type of change

<!--
- Fill x for your type of change.
- e.g.
- [x] Bug fix
-->

- [x] Bug fix
- [ ] Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
- [ ] New Test case
    - [ ] Skipped for non-supported platforms
- [ ] Test case improvement

### Back port request
- [ ] 202012
- [ ] 202205
- [ ] 202305
- [ ] 202311
- [ ] 202405
- [ ] 202411

### Approach
#### What is the motivation for this PR?
PR sonic-net/sonic-mgmt#16736 reintroduces bug that we previously fixed in sonic-net/sonic-mgmt#16313 by making it only applying it to Cisco chassis.

#### How did you do it?
Let `duthosts` be passed to `reboot_and_check` for all T2/chassis devices

#### How did you verify/test it?
Run on non Cisco T2 device

#### Any platform specific information?
N/A

#### Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
N/A

### Documentation
<!--
(If it's a new feature, new test case)
Did you update documentation/Wiki relevant to your implementation?
Link to the wiki page?
-->
N/A
mssonicbld added a commit to Azure/sonic-mgmt.msft that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2025
<!--
Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines;
https://github.com/sonic-net/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md

Please provide following information to help code review process a bit easier:
-->
### Description of PR
<!--
- Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed.
- Please also include relevant motivation and context. Where should reviewer start? background context?
- List any dependencies that are required for this change.
-->

Summary:
Fixes #16898

### Type of change

<!--
- Fill x for your type of change.
- e.g.
- [x] Bug fix
-->

- [x] Bug fix
- [ ] Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
- [ ] New Test case
 - [ ] Skipped for non-supported platforms
- [ ] Test case improvement

### Back port request
- [ ] 202012
- [ ] 202205
- [ ] 202305
- [ ] 202311
- [ ] 202405
- [ ] 202411

### Approach
#### What is the motivation for this PR?
PR sonic-net/sonic-mgmt#16736 reintroduces bug that we previously fixed in sonic-net/sonic-mgmt#16313 by making it only applying it to Cisco chassis.

#### How did you do it?
Let `duthosts` be passed to `reboot_and_check` for all T2/chassis devices

#### How did you verify/test it?
Run on non Cisco T2 device

#### Any platform specific information?
N/A

#### Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
N/A

### Documentation
<!--
(If it's a new feature, new test case)
Did you update documentation/Wiki relevant to your implementation?
Link to the wiki page?
-->
N/A
nnelluri-cisco pushed a commit to nnelluri-cisco/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2025
…et#16736)

Description of PR
Add support for test_power_off_reboot for Cisco 8808 chassis. For chassis, till we can add calculation to find minimum number of PSU up based on the load of the system, we will bringup all the PSU before we continue the test.

Summary:
Fixes # (issue)

Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
Add support for test_power_off_reboot for Cisco 8808 chassis. For chassis, till we can add calculation to find minimum number of PSU up based on the load of the system, we will bringup all the PSU before we continue the test.

How did you do it?
How did you verify/test it?
On T2 profiles

Any platform specific information?
Cisco 8808 chassis

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
Documentation
=========================================================================================== PASSES ===========================================================================================
______________________________________________________________________________ test_power_off_reboot[5-yy39-rp] ______________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________ test_power_off_reboot[15-yy39-rp] ______________________________________________________________________________
------------------------------------------ generated xml file: /run_logs/20590_nightly/platform_tests/test_power_off_reboot_2025-01-30-22-08-39.xml ------------------------------------------
================================================================================== short test summary info ===================================================================================
PASSED platform_tests/test_power_off_reboot.py::test_power_off_reboot[5-yy39-rp]
PASSED platform_tests/test_power_off_reboot.py::test_power_off_reboot[15-yy39-rp]
========================================================================= 2 passed, 1 warning in 2467.92s (0:41:07) ==========================================================================

co-authorized by: jianquanye@microsoft.com
nnelluri-cisco pushed a commit to nnelluri-cisco/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2025
…2 devices get test_power_off_reboot.py fix (sonic-net#16899)

Description of PR
Summary:
Fixes sonic-net#16898

Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
PR sonic-net#16736 reintroduces bug that we previously fixed in sonic-net#16313 by making it only applying it to Cisco chassis.

How did you do it?
Let duthosts be passed to reboot_and_check for all T2/chassis devices

How did you verify/test it?
Run on non Cisco T2 device
Signed-off-by: Javier Tan javiertan@microsoft.com
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants