Skip to content

Ignore lldp test when topology is ptf32 or ptf64.#1054

Closed
iris00522 wants to merge 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
iris00522:snmp
Closed

Ignore lldp test when topology is ptf32 or ptf64.#1054
iris00522 wants to merge 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
iris00522:snmp

Conversation

@iris00522
Copy link
Contributor

Summary:
Fixes #1042

Type of change

  • [] Bug fix
  • [] Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • [+] Test case(new/improvement)

Approach

How did you do it?

Snmp test ignores lldp test when topology is ptf32 or ptf64.

How did you verify/test it?

Tested on the broadcom platform.

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

@lguohan
Copy link
Contributor

lguohan commented Mar 11, 2020

lldp test moved to pytest

@lguohan lguohan closed this Mar 11, 2020
kazinator-arista pushed a commit to kazinator-arista/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2026
linkmgrd:
* 2da783b 2022-06-07 | Check self's mux mode before switching peer to standby & add support for `detach` mode (sonic-net#79) (HEAD -> 202205, github/202205) [Jing Zhang]

sairedis:
* 54642c7 2022-06-09 | [counter] Fix port flex counter  (sonic-net#1052) (HEAD -> 202205, github/202205) [Junhua Zhai]
* b7f5f92 2022-06-06 | [ci] Paralize azure pipeline  (sonic-net#1054) [Shilong Liu]

swss:
* 77043fb 2022-06-09 | [fpmsyncd] don't manipulate route weight (sonic-net#2321) (HEAD -> 202205, github/202205) [Ying Xie]
* ae157f1 2022-06-10 | Fix test_warm_reboot issues blocking PR merge (sonic-net#2309) (sonic-net#2318) [Shilong Liu]

Signed-off-by: Ying Xie <ying.xie@microsoft.com>
sdszhang added a commit to sdszhang/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2026
…g/300m (sonic-net#1054)

### Description of PR
This adds qos params for:
 - t0-f2-d40u8 200g/300m
 - t1-f2-d10u8 400g/300m

### Type of change
- [x] Bug fix
- [ ] Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
- [ ] New Test case
    - [ ] Skipped for non-supported platforms
- [ ] Test case improvement

### Back port request
- [ ] 202205
- [ ] 202305
- [ ] 202311
- [ ] 202405
- [ ] 202411
- [ ] 202505
- [ ] 202511

### Approach

#### How did you do it?
Values were generated by automated script

#### How did you verify/test it?
Manually tested

Signed-off-by: Sonic Build Admin <sonicbld@microsoft.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[SNMP] Missing lldp data in snmp test

2 participants