Skip to content

[Ingrasys] Add platform support for S9280-64X with Barefoot ASIC#1769

Closed
cytsai0409 wants to merge 1 commit intosonic-net:201712from
cytsai0409:201712
Closed

[Ingrasys] Add platform support for S9280-64X with Barefoot ASIC#1769
cytsai0409 wants to merge 1 commit intosonic-net:201712from
cytsai0409:201712

Conversation

@cytsai0409
Copy link
Contributor

- What I did
Add Ingrasys S9280-64x (64*100G) platform support with Barefoot ASIC

- How I did it
Add platform drivers and configuration files

- How to verify it
Do sanity checks on the device

- Description for the changelog
[Ingrasys] Add platform support for S9280-64X with Barefoot ASIC

@cytsai0409
Copy link
Contributor Author

will resubmit this pull request after Barefoot SAI 1.3 is ready

@cytsai0409 cytsai0409 closed this Jun 7, 2018
@cytsai0409
Copy link
Contributor Author

cytsai0409 commented Jun 8, 2018

[update] will resubmit this pull request if build errors on 201712 branch are fixed by #1775

qiluo-msft pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2021
#### Why I did it
Update submodule pointer for swss to include recent changes

4f1d726 [portsorch] fix errors when moving port from one lag to another. (#1797)
ae44701 [orchagent] Put port configuration to APPL_DB according to autoneg mode (#1769)
5295f91 Add failure handling for SAI get operations (#1768)
7c7c451 Revert recirc port change (#1813)
5528ebf Cleanup code (#1814)
judyjoseph pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2021
#### Why I did it
Update submodule pointer for swss to include recent changes

4f1d726 [portsorch] fix errors when moving port from one lag to another. (#1797)
ae44701 [orchagent] Put port configuration to APPL_DB according to autoneg mode (#1769)
5295f91 Add failure handling for SAI get operations (#1768)
7c7c451 Revert recirc port change (#1813)
5528ebf Cleanup code (#1814)
carl-nokia pushed a commit to carl-nokia/sonic-buildimage that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2021
#### Why I did it
Update submodule pointer for swss to include recent changes

4f1d726 [portsorch] fix errors when moving port from one lag to another. (sonic-net#1797)
ae44701 [orchagent] Put port configuration to APPL_DB according to autoneg mode (sonic-net#1769)
5295f91 Add failure handling for SAI get operations (sonic-net#1768)
7c7c451 Revert recirc port change (sonic-net#1813)
5528ebf Cleanup code (sonic-net#1814)
theasianpianist pushed a commit to theasianpianist/sonic-buildimage that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2022
…de (sonic-net#1769)

*Before puting port related configuration to APPL_DB, check autoneg mode first. If autoneg mode is enabled, "speed" and "interface_type" will not be put into APPL_DB; if autoneg mode is disabled, "adv_speeds" and "adv_interface_types" will not be put into APPL_DB; else all configuration will be put to APPL_DB for backward compatible.
Ndancejic pushed a commit to Ndancejic/sonic-buildimage that referenced this pull request May 3, 2022
* Put port operational speed to STATE DB
* Remove previous workaround [orchagent] Put port configuration to APPL_DB according to autoneg mode sonic-net#1769
peterbailey-arista pushed a commit to peterbailey-arista/sonic-buildimage that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2025
Changes missing from msft_202503:
sonic-net#23908
sonic-net#23722

Was already added for Arista-7060X6-64PE-B-O128 in
Azure/sonic-buildimage-msft#1674

<!--
Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines:
     https://github.com/Azure/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md

** Make sure all your commits include a signature generated with `git
commit -s` **

If this is a bug fix, make sure your description includes "fixes #xxxx",
or
     "closes #xxxx" or "resolves #xxxx"

     Please provide the following information:
-->

#### Why I did it

##### Work item tracking
- Microsoft ADO **(number only)**:

#### How I did it

#### How to verify it

<!--
If PR needs to be backported, then the PR must be tested against the
base branch and the earliest backport release branch and provide tested
image version on these two branches. For example, if the PR is requested
for master, 202211 and 202012, then the requester needs to provide test
results on master and 202012.
-->

#### Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

<!--
- Note we only backport fixes to a release branch, *not* features!
- Please also provide a reason for the backporting below.
- e.g.
- [x] 202006
-->

- [ ] 201811
- [ ] 201911
- [ ] 202006
- [ ] 202012
- [ ] 202106
- [ ] 202111
- [ ] 202205
- [ ] 202211

#### Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

<!--
- Please provide tested image version
- e.g.
- [x] 20201231.100
-->

- [ ] <!-- image version 1 -->
- [ ] <!-- image version 2 -->

#### Description for the changelog
<!--
Write a short (one line) summary that describes the changes in this
pull request for inclusion in the changelog:
-->

<!--
Ensure to add label/tag for the feature raised. example - PR#2174 under
sonic-utilities repo. where, Generic Config and Update feature has been
labelled as GCU.
-->

#### Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes
<!--
Provide a link to config_db schema for the table for which YANG model
is defined
Link should point to correct section on
https://github.com/Azure/sonic-buildimage/blob/master/src/sonic-yang-models/doc/Configuration.md
-->

#### A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)
mssonicbld added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2026
…tically (#25906)

#### Why I did it
src/sonic-sairedis
```
* ca4fe78a - (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) Support route update (#1772) (4 days ago) [yue-fred-gao]
* 3679821a - [DPU] Add support for Flow bulk session get notifications (#1769) (6 days ago) [Vivek]
* ba4bbd8e - vpp: fix bogus errors (#1642) (7 days ago) [yue-fred-gao]
```
#### How I did it
#### How to verify it
#### Description for the changelog
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant