Conversation
|
Does this need still to be a beta? Why not release 1.1.0 proper? (Arguably it should be 2.0.0 anyway because it surely has breaking changes since 1.0.x: but I'm more keen to encourage dropping the beta tag than I am to debate semantic versioning) |
|
I'm not aware of the full impact of a proper release. I suppose a beta does not influence projects with something like whereas a proper release might. I suppose we will do the proper release of poetry-core immediately before poetry 1.2 and according to python-poetry/poetry#5586 we are still not close enough. (Just my personal opinion.) |
|
fwiw I also think it's time to cut poetry 1.2.0 - all the blockers listed in python-poetry/poetry#5586 have fixes pending, let's merge them and go. But it really ought to be possible to cut releases in this project without being blocked on that. |
mkniewallner
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Unless it was left out intentionally, #404 seems to be missing. In Fixed:
- Fixed script definitions that didn't work when extras were not explicitly defined ([#404](https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry-core/pull/404)).e766a8a to
431c148
Compare
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!
|
Slipped through my fingers. Added it. Thanks. 👍 |








Some poetry PRs have been waiting for a new poetry-core beta for some time now. Since the latest poetry beta pinned poetry-core to 1.1.0b2, the risk of a new beta should be low. Thus, I propose to just cut a new poetry-core beta.
(Order of sections according to python-poetry/poetry#5725 (comment).)
Added
Changed
Dependency.set_constraint()and replaced it by aconstraintproperty for consistency (#370).Package.requires_extras(#374).Fixed
PackageSpecification,Package,Dependencyand their sub classes (#370).python_versionandpython_full_version(#382, #388).