Conversation
056ddb7 to
c3df4f8
Compare
bolinfest
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 23, 2026
## Why The current escalate path in `codex-rs/exec-server` still had policy creation coupled to MCP details, which makes it hard to reuse the shell execution flow outside the MCP server. This change is part of a broader goal to split MCP-specific behavior from shared escalation execution so other handlers (for example a future `ShellCommandHandler`) can reuse it without depending on MCP request context types. ## What changed - Added a new `EscalationPolicyFactory` abstraction in `mcp.rs`: - `crate`-relative path: `codex-rs/exec-server/src/posix/mcp.rs` - https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/main/codex-rs/exec-server/src/posix/mcp.rs#L87-L107 - Made `run_escalate_server` in `mcp.rs` accept a policy factory instead of constructing `McpEscalationPolicy` directly. - https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/main/codex-rs/exec-server/src/posix/mcp.rs#L178-L201 - Introduced `McpEscalationPolicyFactory` that stores MCP-only state (`RequestContext`, `preserve_program_paths`) and implements the new trait. - https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/main/codex-rs/exec-server/src/posix/mcp.rs#L100-L117 - Updated `shell()` to pass a `McpEscalationPolicyFactory` instance into `run_escalate_server`, so the server remains the MCP-specific wiring layer. - https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/main/codex-rs/exec-server/src/posix/mcp.rs#L163-L170 ## Verification - Build and test execution was not re-run in this pass; changes are limited to `mcp.rs` and preserve the existing escalation flow semantics by only extracting policy construction behind a factory. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/12555). * #12556 * __->__ #12555
This was referenced Feb 23, 2026
nornagon-openai
approved these changes
Feb 23, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
Shell execution refactoring in
exec-serverhad become split between duplicated code paths, which blocked a clean introduction of the new reusable shell escalation flow. This commit creates a dedicated foundation crate so later shell tooling changes can share one implementation.What changed
codex-shell-escalationcrate and moved the core escalation pieces (mcpprotocol/socket/session flow, policy glue) that were previously inexec-serverinto it.exec-serverUnix structure under a dedicatedunixmodule layout and kept non-Unix builds narrow.shell-escalationis a first-class workspace dependency for follow-on integration work.Verification
just clippy.Stack created with Sapling. Best reviewed with ReviewStack.