I have created a one click deploy button for railway users 🧙‍♂️

[MarcBlattmann]

Added a deployment button for Railway in the README.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Added a "One click deploys" section to the README featuring a "Deploy on Railway" badge and link.
  • Clarified deployment information for quicker setup.
  • No functional changes were introduced and public-facing behavior remains unchanged.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Added a new "One click deploys" section to README.md containing a Deploy on Railway badge/link; documentation-only change with no code or API modifications.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation Badge README.md	Added a "One click deploys" section with a Deploy on Railway badge/link; no functional changes

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐇 I hopped into the README bright,
I left a badge that gleamed with light,
One click to launch, a tiny feat,
A rabbit's nudge — deployment sweet,
I twitch my nose and bound in delight.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check	✅ Passed	The pull request title "I have created a one click deploy button for railway users 🧙‍♂️" directly and clearly describes the main change in the pull request: adding a Deploy on Railway badge/link to the README. The title is fully related to the changeset and accurately communicates the primary change a teammate would encounter when reviewing the PR. While the title includes an emoji which the guidelines suggest avoiding as noise, the title itself remains clear, specific, and not misleading or off-topic.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c0984d0 and 2d792b4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (1 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• README.md

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)

• GitHub Check: ci / test

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

README.md (1)

95-96: Consider placement and referral code transparency.

The Railway deployment badge is a nice addition for users, but two aspects warrant attention:

1. Placement: This badge is logically related to app deployment and hosting. It might be more discoverable if placed in the "Hosting MaybeSure" section (line 39-41) rather than after the License section. Readers looking for deployment options would find it more naturally there.

2. Referral code: The URL includes a referral code (bE8vHp). In community-maintained open-source projects, it's important to be transparent about any potential affiliate relationships or monetization. Consider adding a note explaining the referral code, or discuss with maintainers whether this aligns with the project's values.

If the referral code is intended for project sustainability, consider adding a brief note in the README or CONTRIBUTING guide to document this. If it's personal, you may want to discuss with the maintainers whether including it is appropriate for a community fork.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d51ba51 and f15785c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (1 hunks)

[jjmata]

All PRs should be this short! ;-)

[jjmata]

Woza! Noticed we can do like with PikaPods and get a little bit of money from deployments to Railway ... added back the referral code to our org. 👍

[jjmata]

How much do you estimate it costs to run Sure on Railway, @MarcBlattmann?

[MarcBlattmann]

How much do you estimate it costs to run Sure on Railway, @MarcBlattmann?

Right now i pay around 1.8Euro for just myself so realy cheap :)

[jjmata]

How much do you estimate it costs to run Sure on Railway, @MarcBlattmann?

Right now i pay around 1.8Euro for just myself so realy cheap :)

Nice! Looking a little more into this ... and adding it to a new (free) pricing page that I am about to push. Are these stats below for this specific template, @MarcBlattmann?

[jjmata]

Thinking of taking over the template as well (just publishing a new one if you don't mind, and asking you to remove the other one) since I'll be able to keep the config values updated more easily from my vantage point. Would you mind if we do that? No rush ... just getting ready for it in the next few days.

[MarcBlattmann]

How much do you estimate it costs to run Sure on Railway, @MarcBlattmann?

Right now i pay around 1.8Euro for just myself so realy cheap :)

Nice! Looking a little more into this ... and adding it to a new (free) pricing page that I am about to push. Are these stats below for this specific template, @MarcBlattmann?

Yeah these values are automatically updated and set by Railway 👍