Skip to content

Evaluate using Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) and Post-Link Optimization (PLO) on ctags #3849

@zamazan4ik

Description

@zamazan4ik

Hi!

Recently I checked Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) improvements on multiple projects. The results are available here. I also have several examples of applying PGO to the software like ctags:

That's why I think trying to optimize ctags with PGO can be a good idea.

I can suggest the following action points:

  • Perform PGO benchmarks on ctags. And if it shows improvements - add a note to the documentation about possible improvements in ctags performance with PGO.
  • Providing an easier way (e.g. an additional build option) to build scripts with PGO can be helpful for the end-users and maintainers since they will be able to optimize ctags according to their workloads.
  • Optimize pre-built binaries (if it's possible to prepare a good training workload)

Testing Post-Link Optimization techniques (like LLVM BOLT) would be interesting too (Clang and Rustc already use BOLT as an addition to PGO) but I recommend starting from the usual PGO.

Here are some examples of how PGO optimization is integrated in other projects:

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions