-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41.7k
Issue 39565 #39590
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Issue 39565 #39590
Conversation
At present, Actuator sessions endpoint is supported only on a Servlet stack and also requires an indexed session repository. With Spring Session moving to non-indexed session repositories as a default for some session stores, this means that sessions endpoint won't be available unless users opt into a (non-default) indexed session repository. This commit updates SessionEndpoint so that it is able to work with a non-indexed session repository. In such setup, it exposes operations for fetching session by id and deleting the session. Additionally, this also adds support for reactive stack by introducing ReactiveSessionEndpoint and its auto-configuration support. See spring-projectsgh-32046
* pr/32046: Use ReactiveFindByIndexNameSessionRepository Polish "Provide an Actuator endpoint for non-indexed session repositories" Provide an Actuator endpoint for non-indexed session repositories Closes spring-projectsgh-32046
|
@jakesmolka Please sign the Contributor License Agreement! Click here to manually synchronize the status of this Pull Request. See the FAQ for frequently asked questions. |
|
@jakesmolka Thank you for signing the Contributor License Agreement! |
Yes, this is parsed from the JavaDoc. |
Addressing: #39565
Dear @mhalbritter and team, I saw the ideal-for-contribution label and just gave it a try. Honestly, since there are just some lines of changes, I'm not sure if that is really what was requested.
Question for my understanding: Is the "When to show unsanitized values." line from the ref doc page parsed from the javadoc comment in the source? This metadata.json file has a
descriptionfield, but not for all entries.Targeting
3.1.xbranch, because of the milestone.