Skip to content

[test]: Change the default router interface MTU to 9100#578

Merged
lguohan merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
stcheng:9100
Aug 16, 2018
Merged

[test]: Change the default router interface MTU to 9100#578
lguohan merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
stcheng:9100

Conversation

@stcheng
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@stcheng stcheng commented Aug 15, 2018

With the recent pull requests, if the router interface is created
without specifying the MTU in the configuration database, the
default MTU would be 9100 instead of 1500.

Note:
9100 comes from the orchagent/port.h; 1500 comes from the kernel.

Signed-off-by: Shu0T1an ChenG [email protected]

With the recent pull requests, if the router interface is created
without specifying the MTU in the configuration database, the
default MTU would be 9100 instead of 1500.

Note:
9100 comes from the orchagent/port.h; 1500 comes from the kernel.

Signed-off-by: Shu0T1an ChenG <[email protected]>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jipanyang jipanyang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To get around the VS test problem, this is need.
port MTU setting from configDB needs separate fix.

@lguohan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

lguohan commented Aug 16, 2018

retest this please

@lguohan lguohan merged commit 6880d08 into sonic-net:master Aug 16, 2018
Janetxxx pushed a commit to Janetxxx/sonic-swss that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2025
With the recent pull requests, if the router interface is created
without specifying the MTU in the configuration database, the
default MTU would be 9100 instead of 1500.

Note:
9100 comes from the orchagent/port.h; 1500 comes from the kernel.

Signed-off-by: Shu0T1an ChenG <[email protected]>
jianyuewu pushed a commit to jianyuewu/sonic-swss that referenced this pull request Dec 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants