Skip to content

Add NEIGHBOR_MISS trap type and its own queue#3646

Closed
msherif1234 wants to merge 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
msherif1234:add_nbr_miss_trap
Closed

Add NEIGHBOR_MISS trap type and its own queue#3646
msherif1234 wants to merge 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
msherif1234:add_nbr_miss_trap

Conversation

@msherif1234
Copy link
Copy Markdown

What I did
Add new trap type SAI_HOSTIF_TRAP_TYPE_NEIGHBOR_MISS and dedicated queue
to better control those punt packets and not impact other critical punt traffic

Why I did it
As proposed in https://github.com/sonic-net/SONiC/blob/1fba16368a803bfeea57d93e8e39b3bcdcc3a67d/doc/copp/Copp_Neighbor_Miss_Trap_And_Enhancements.md we wanted to protect cpu from being hogged with neighbor miss packets

How I verified it

Details if related

Signed-off-by: Mohamed S. Mahmoud <mmahmoud2201@gmail.com>
@msherif1234 msherif1234 requested a review from prsunny as a code owner May 14, 2025 16:14
@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link
Copy Markdown

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented May 14, 2025

CLA Signed


The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@msherif1234 msherif1234 marked this pull request as draft May 14, 2025 16:28
@dgsudharsan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@msherif1234 we already have a PR for this. #3624

@rck-innovium
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@prsunny @msherif1234 This seems to be a duplicate of #3624.

@msherif1234
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@msherif1234 we already have a PR for this. #3624

yeah sorry didn't notice the open PR I will close mine Thanks

@msherif1234 msherif1234 deleted the add_nbr_miss_trap branch May 16, 2025 11:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants