[platform] Implement platform phase 2 cases#980
Merged
liat-grozovik merged 3 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom Jul 21, 2019
wangxin:platform-phase2-pr
Merged
[platform] Implement platform phase 2 cases#980liat-grozovik merged 3 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom wangxin:platform-phase2-pr
liat-grozovik merged 3 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom
wangxin:platform-phase2-pr
Conversation
Implement the SONiC platform phase 2 test cases using the pytest-ansible framework. Signed-off-by: Xin Wang <xinw@mellanox.com>
jleveque
approved these changes
Jul 1, 2019
lguohan
reviewed
Jul 11, 2019
lguohan
approved these changes
Jul 11, 2019
* Run reboot command in background to avoid command failure caused by SSH connection broken before command returns * Fine tune the reboot wait timeout values * Add delay before checking interface status because the intfutil command may have no output in time Signed-off-by: Xin Wang <xinw@mellanox.com>
liat-grozovik
approved these changes
Jul 21, 2019
fraserg-arista
pushed a commit
to fraserg-arista/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 24, 2026
…ic-net#980) <!-- Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines; https://github.com/sonic-net/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md Please provide following information to help code review process a bit easier: --> ### Description of PR <!-- - Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. - Please also include relevant motivation and context. Where should reviewer start? background context? - List any dependencies that are required for this change. --> Summary: Fixes # (issue) ### Type of change <!-- - Fill x for your type of change. - e.g. - [x] Bug fix --> - [x] Bug fix - [ ] Testbed and Framework(new/improvement) - [ ] New Test case - [ ] Skipped for non-supported platforms - [ ] Test case improvement ### Approach #### What is the motivation for this PR? Packet trimming tests rely on simulating congestion on an egress queue. For this, the tests are trying to apply a shaper that significantly slows down the amount of packets sent out of the target egress queue per second. We found that this shaper doesn't work on th5 with the current config. #### How did you do it? The solution to this is to add `"meter_type" packets` when creating the blocking scheduler (shaper). #### How did you verify/test it? Verified via `tcpdump` that packet transmission rate was slowed down as expected on th5. #### Any platform specific information? This issue was discovered when testing on th5 #### Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case? ### Documentation <!-- (If it's a new feature, new test case) Did you update documentation/Wiki relevant to your implementation? Link to the wiki page? -->
kazinator-arista
pushed a commit
to kazinator-arista/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 4, 2026
Intf table migration for APP_DB entries during warmboot (sonic-net#980) [Multi NPU] Time Improvements to the config reload/load_minigraph commands (sonic-net#917)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of PR
Summary:
Fixes # (issue)
Implement the SONiC platform phase 2 test cases using the pytest-ansible framework. This implementation is based on the phase 1 scripts: #915
The SONiC platform test cases are documented here:
https://github.com/Azure/SONiC/blob/master/doc/pmon/sonic_platform_test_plan.md
Test cases implemented in phase 2:
Some extra helper scritps are also included in this PR. The helper scripts contain re-usable code for checking various status:
Type of change
Approach
How did you do it?
Implement the SONiC platform phase 2 test cases using the pytest-ansible framework and follow the design of PR #802
How did you verify/test it?
Tested on the mellanox platform
Any platform specific information?
The scritps contain some platform specific checking. This pattern is used for such checking:
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
All current test topologies are supported:
[t0, t0-16, t0-56, t0-64, t0-64-32, t0-116, t1, t1-lag, t1-64-lag, ptf32, ptf64]
Documentation
The SONiC platform test plan:
https://github.com/Azure/SONiC/blob/master/doc/pmon/sonic_platform_test_plan.md