[everflow][m0] Add support for m0 in everflow to simulate both t0 and t1#7618
Conversation
|
The pre-commit check detected issues in the files touched by this pull request. For old issues, it is not mandatory to fix them because they were not caused by this change. It is unfair to blame Detailed pre-commit check results: To run the pre-commit checks locally, you can follow below steps:
|
|
@Blueve Could you help to review this PR? |
…h t0 and t1 #7618 (#7638) What is the motivation for this PR? Manually cherry-pick and resolve conflicts of this PR: #7618 In current everflow test for m0, just simulate scenario that m0 device performs like t1. But m0 is like both t1 and t0. How did you do it? Add support for m0 in everflow test to simulate both t0 and t1 scenario How did you verify/test it? Run tests on m0 topo and t0 topo Signed-off-by: Yaqiang Zhu <[email protected]>
|
The pre-commit check detected issues in the files touched by this pull request. For old issues, it is not mandatory to fix them because they were not caused by this change. It is unfair to blame Detailed pre-commit check results: To run the pre-commit checks locally, you can follow below steps:
|
… t1 (sonic-net#7618) What is the motivation for this PR? In current everflow test for m0, just simulate scenario that m0 device performs like t1. But m0 is like both t1 and t0. How did you do it? Add support for m0 in everflow test to simulate both t0 and t1 scenario How did you verify/test it? Run tests on m0 topo and t0 topo Signed-off-by: Yaqiang Zhu <[email protected]>
What is the motivation for this PR? Manually cherry-pick and resolve conflicts of adding support for m0 to simulate both t0 and t1 in everflow and bgp test. #7389 #7618 #6900 How did you verify/test it? Run everflow and bgp test on m0/t0/t1 testbeds, no errors. Signed-off-by: Yaqiang Zhu <[email protected]>
Description of PR
Summary:
Fixes # (issue)
Type of change
Back port request
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
In current everflow test for m0, just simulate scenario that m0 device performs like t1. But m0 is like both t1 and t0.
How did you do it?
Add support for m0 in everflow test to simulate both t0 and t1 scenario
How did you verify/test it?
Run tests on m0 topo and t0 topo
m0 topo:
t0 topo:
Any platform specific information?
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
Documentation