[action] [PR:21340] stabilize test_dscp_to_queue_mapping and skip warm-reboot step on smartswitch#22022
Merged
vmittal-msft merged 1 commit intosonic-net:202511from Feb 2, 2026
Conversation
1. To mitigate the impact of noise packets, flush the PTF dataplane before sending and verifying packets 2. Increase the timeout in case ptf can not handle all packet in the buffer during 1 second, the ptf buffer has a lot of packets
11 tasks
Collaborator
Author
|
Original PR: #21340 |
github-actions
bot
requested review from
XuChen-MSFT,
vmittal-msft and
xwjiang-ms
vmittal-msft
approved these changes
Feb 2, 2026
lakshmi-nexthop
pushed a commit
to lakshmi-nexthop/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 11, 2026
1. To mitigate the impact of noise packets, flush the PTF dataplane before sending and verifying packets 2. Increase the timeout in case ptf can not handle all packet in the buffer during 1 second, the ptf buffer has a lot of packets Co-authored-by: Jibin Bao <jbao@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Yarramaneni <lakshmi@nexthop.ai>
fraserg-arista
pushed a commit
to fraserg-arista/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 24, 2026
<!-- Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines; https://github.com/sonic-net/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md Please provide following information to help code review process a bit easier: --> ### Description of PR <!-- - Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. - Please also include relevant motivation and context. Where should reviewer start? background context? - List any dependencies that are required for this change. --> Summary: Fixes same issue in [sonic-net#22022](sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#22022) by updating the peer T0's ASN to 4 bytes ASN number. ### Type of change <!-- - Fill x for your type of change. - e.g. - [x] Bug fix --> - [ ] Bug fix - [ ] Testbed and Framework(new/improvement) - [ ] New Test case - [ ] Skipped for non-supported platforms - [ ] Test case improvement ### Back port request - [ ] 202012 - [ ] 202205 - [ ] 202305 - [ ] 202311 - [ ] 202405 - [ ] 202411 ### Approach #### What is the motivation for this PR? Fix topo error. #### How did you do it? #### How did you verify/test it? ``` admin@sonic:~$ show ip bgp summary IPv4 Unicast Summary: BGP router identifier 10.1.0.32, local AS number 65100 vrf-id 0 BGP table version 2 RIB entries 3, using 672 bytes of memory Peers 12, using 8903712 KiB of memory Peer groups 5, using 320 bytes of memory Neighbhor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd NeighborName ----------- --- ---------- --------- --------- -------- ----- ------ --------- -------------- -------------- 10.0.0.57 4 64600 0 0 0 0 0 never Active ARISTA01T1 10.0.0.59 4 64600 0 0 0 0 0 never Active ARISTA02T1 10.0.0.61 4 64600 0 0 0 0 0 never Active ARISTA03T1 10.0.0.63 4 64600 0 0 0 0 0 never Active ARISTA04T1 10.0.0.65 4 64600 0 0 0 0 0 never Active ARISTA05T1 10.0.0.67 4 64600 0 0 0 0 0 never Active ARISTA06T1 10.0.0.69 4 64600 0 0 0 0 0 never Active ARISTA07T1 10.0.0.71 4 64600 0 0 0 0 0 never Active ARISTA08T1 10.0.0.157 4 4200000000 0 0 0 0 0 never Active ARISTA01PT0 10.0.0.159 4 4200000001 0 0 0 0 0 never Active ARISTA02PT0 10.0.0.161 4 4200000002 0 0 0 0 0 never Active ARISTA03PT0 10.0.0.163 4 4200000003 0 0 0 0 0 never Active ARISTA04PT0 Total number of neighbors 12 admin@sonic:~$ show ipv6 bgp summary IPv6 Unicast Summary: BGP router identifier 10.1.0.32, local AS number 65100 vrf-id 0 BGP table version 2 RIB entries 3, using 672 bytes of memory Peers 12, using 8903712 KiB of memory Peer groups 5, using 320 bytes of memory Neighbhor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd NeighborName ----------- --- ---------- --------- --------- -------- ----- ------ --------- -------------- -------------- fc00::7a 4 64600 0 0 0 0 0 never Active ARISTA03T1 fc00::7e 4 64600 0 0 0 0 0 never Active ARISTA04T1 fc00::8a 4 64600 0 0 0 0 0 never Active ARISTA07T1 fc00::8e 4 64600 0 0 0 0 0 never Active ARISTA08T1 fc00::17a 4 4200000002 0 0 0 0 0 never Active ARISTA03PT0 fc00::17e 4 4200000003 0 0 0 0 0 never Active ARISTA04PT0 fc00::72 4 64600 0 0 0 0 0 never Active ARISTA01T1 fc00::76 4 64600 0 0 0 0 0 never Active ARISTA02T1 fc00::82 4 64600 0 0 0 0 0 never Active ARISTA05T1 fc00::86 4 64600 0 0 0 0 0 never Active ARISTA06T1 fc00::172 4 4200000000 0 0 0 0 0 never Active ARISTA01PT0 fc00::176 4 4200000001 0 0 0 0 0 never Active ARISTA02PT0 Total number of neighbors 12 admin@sonic:~$ ``` #### Any platform specific information? #### Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case? ### Documentation <!-- (If it's a new feature, new test case) Did you update documentation/Wiki relevant to your implementation? Link to the wiki page? -->
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of PR
Summary:
Fixes # (issue)
Type of change
Back port request
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
Stabilize test_dscp_to_queue_mapping
How did you do it?
How did you verify/test it?
run test_dscp_to_queue_mapping
Any platform specific information?
Any
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
Documentation