Skip to content

[action] [PR:19592] [snappi-T2] Fix pfcwd/test_pfcwd_actions.py to consider asic value#19950

Merged
mssonicbld merged 1 commit intosonic-net:202505from
mssonicbld:cherry/202505/19592
Jul 31, 2025
Merged

[action] [PR:19592] [snappi-T2] Fix pfcwd/test_pfcwd_actions.py to consider asic value#19950
mssonicbld merged 1 commit intosonic-net:202505from
mssonicbld:cherry/202505/19592

Conversation

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Description of PR

Summary: [snappi-T2] Fix pfcwd/test_pfcwd_actions.py to consider asic value
Fixes # #19591

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • New Test case
  • Skipped for non-supported platforms
  • Test case improvement

Back port request

  • 202205
  • 202305
  • 202311
  • 202405
  • 202411
  • 202505
  • msft-202405

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

Helper method run_pfc_test is not passing asic_value of the port for enabling/disabling of pfcwd on the dut. This causes config to be not applied for multi-asic devices, where config command needs to be run on asic namespace. And test is failing with No Tx PFCs from DUT after receiving PFCs.

How did you do it?

Updated helper method to pass asic_value correctly.

How did you verify/test it?

Test is passing with the fix.

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

…onic-net#19592)

Description of PR
Summary: [snappi-T2] Fix pfcwd/test_pfcwd_actions.py to consider asic value
Fixes # sonic-net#19591

Type of change
 Bug fix
 Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
 New Test case
 Skipped for non-supported platforms
 Test case improvement
Back port request
 202205
 202305
 202311
 202405
 202411
 202505
 msft-202405
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
Helper method run_pfc_test is not passing asic_value of the port for enabling/disabling of pfcwd on the dut. This causes config to be not applied for multi-asic devices, where config command needs to be run on asic namespace. And test is failing with No Tx PFCs from DUT after receiving PFCs.

How did you do it?
Updated helper method to pass asic_value correctly.

How did you verify/test it?
Test is passing with the fix.

co-authorized by: jianquanye@microsoft.com
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Original PR: #19592

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mssonicbld mssonicbld merged commit 7bdbb0b into sonic-net:202505 Jul 31, 2025
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants