Fix test_cacl_application for latest change in caclmgrd#13786
Fix test_cacl_application for latest change in caclmgrd#13786wangxin merged 3 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Zhaohui Sun <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Zhaohui Sun <[email protected]>
|
/azp run |
|
Commenter does not have sufficient privileges for PR 13786 in repo sonic-net/sonic-mgmt |
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Signed-off-by: Zhaohui Sun <[email protected]>
| - bgp/test_bgp_speaker.py | ||
| - bgp/test_bgp_update_timer.py | ||
| - bgp/test_bgpmon.py | ||
| - cacl/test_cacl_application.py |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
With the skip rule in conditional mark, probably we can keep this line here to include in in PR testing. Then after the issue is fixed and resolved, then this script will be automatically covered by PR testing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@wangxin In my second commit, I added the skip condition and kept this line, but PR test still kept failing with this case, that's why I removed this line, I will add this line back when image change is included.
|
@ZhaohuiS Why you remove the script |
) What is the motivation for this PR? RP test will fail after sonic-net/sonic-host-services#139, update the case accordingly. How did you do it? add expected iptable rules How did you verify/test it? run cacl/test_cacl_application.py Signed-off-by: Zhaohui Sun <[email protected]>
|
Hi @ZhaohuiS May I ask is there any plan to cherry-pick to 202405 branch? |
@weiguo-nvidia It has been in 202405 already. #13900 |
) What is the motivation for this PR? RP test will fail after sonic-net/sonic-host-services#139, update the case accordingly. How did you do it? add expected iptable rules How did you verify/test it? run cacl/test_cacl_application.py Signed-off-by: Zhaohui Sun <[email protected]>
) What is the motivation for this PR? RP test will fail after sonic-net/sonic-host-services#139, update the case accordingly. How did you do it? add expected iptable rules How did you verify/test it? run cacl/test_cacl_application.py Signed-off-by: Zhaohui Sun <[email protected]>
Description of PR
Summary:
Fixes # (issue)
According PR sonic-net/sonic-host-services#139, the expected iptables rules are changed.
Type of change
Back port request
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
RP test will fail after sonic-net/sonic-host-services#139, update the case accordingly.
How did you do it?
add expected iptable rules
How did you verify/test it?
run cacl/test_cacl_application.py
Any platform specific information?
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
Documentation