[sonic-mgmt] Call docker cmd on appropriate container in generate_telemetry_config() funct#11552
Conversation
|
The pre-commit check detected issues in the files touched by this pull request. Detailed pre-commit check results: To run the pre-commit checks locally, you can follow below steps:
|
|
@ganglyu could you help to review ? |
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
The pre-commit check detected issues in the files touched by this pull request. Detailed pre-commit check results: To run the pre-commit checks locally, you can follow below steps:
|
|
@veronica-arista one of the pre-commit checks is failing, please fix Pre-commit check results:
tests/common/helpers/gnmi_utils.py:55:121: E501 line too long (123 > 120 characters) |
|
/azp run Azure.sonic-mgmt |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
The pre-commit check detected issues in the files touched by this pull request. Detailed pre-commit check results: To run the pre-commit checks locally, you can follow below steps:
|
|
@veronica-arista @kenneth-arista please reaolve the flake errors and conflicts before merge - thanks |
generate_telemetry_config() funct generate_telemetry_config() function already establishes that the GNMI container is 'telemetry' so call docker supervisorctl status using this container name.
d9ab212 to
fe48ee4
Compare
|
The pre-commit check detected issues in the files touched by this pull request. Detailed pre-commit check results: To run the pre-commit checks locally, you can follow below steps:
|
|
The pre-commit check detected issues in the files touched by this pull request. Detailed pre-commit check results: To run the pre-commit checks locally, you can follow below steps:
|
|
hi @veronica-arista could you run test with 202305 and 202311 branch? |
|
Hi @StormLiangMS we are running the gnmi tests with this change in our test environment and they are passing for 202305 and 202311 |
…emetry_config() funct (sonic-net#11552) Description of PR generate_telemetry_config() function already establishes that the GNMI container is 'telemetry' so call docker supervisorctl status using this container name. Summary: Fixes # aristanetworks/sonic-qual.msft#61
|
Cherry-pick PR to 202305: #12867 |
|
@veronica-arista PR conflicts with 202311 branch |
…emetry_config() funct (#11552) Description of PR generate_telemetry_config() function already establishes that the GNMI container is 'telemetry' so call docker supervisorctl status using this container name. Summary: Fixes # aristanetworks/sonic-qual.msft#61
|
I created a 202311 version of the PR to resolve the conflict: #12873 |
Description of PR
generate_telemetry_config()function already establishes that the GNMI container is 'telemetry' so call docker supervisorctl status using this container name.Summary:
Fixes #
https://github.com/aristanetworks/sonic-qual.msft/issues/61
Type of change
Back port request
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
How did you do it?
How did you verify/test it?
Ran gnmi tests with this change in our test environment.
Any platform specific information?
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
Documentation