Skip to content

Added conditional check for ptf32 topo in snmp.yml file#1044

Closed
rajneeshaec wants to merge 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
rajneeshaec:sonic-mgmt-marvell
Closed

Added conditional check for ptf32 topo in snmp.yml file#1044
rajneeshaec wants to merge 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
rajneeshaec:sonic-mgmt-marvell

Conversation

@rajneeshaec
Copy link
Contributor

####Description of PR
snmp.yml

  • snmp lldp test case is failing with ptf32 topology
  • PTF-32 topology is not using the arista-veos VM's.That's why this test case is
    not valid for ptf32 topology.Test-case will fail For remote values check.
  • sonic DUT is not returning any lldp data with Ptf32 topology
  • Added condition to check the testbed_type != ptf32

Summary:
Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • [-/] Bug fix
  • [] Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • [] Test case(new/improvement)

Approach

How did you do it?

Added conditional check in roles/test/tasks/snmp.yml file

How did you verify/test it?

tested in local testbed

Any platform specific information?

N/A

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

N/A

Documentation

N/A

@rajneeshaec rajneeshaec closed this Aug 6, 2019
@rajneeshaec rajneeshaec deleted the sonic-mgmt-marvell branch August 6, 2019 11:16
kazinator-arista pushed a commit to kazinator-arista/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2026
544e4c2 (origin/202012) [ci] Paralize azure pipeline (sonic-net#1044)
45b310d Enable SAI_SWITCH_ATTR_UNINIT_DATA_PLANE_ON_REMOVAL attribute (sonic-net#1016)
9e56674 Advance submodule SAI for 202012 branch (sonic-net#1032)

Signed-off-by: bingwang <[email protected]>
sdszhang pushed a commit to sdszhang/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2026
… multi-vlan for dhcpv6_relay test (sonic-net#1044)

<!--
Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines;
https://github.com/sonic-net/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md

Please provide following information to help code review process a bit easier:
-->
### Description of PR
<!--
- Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed.
- Please also include relevant motivation and context. Where should reviewer start? background context?
- List any dependencies that are required for this change.
-->

Summary:
Fixes # (issue)

### Type of change

<!--
- Fill x for your type of change.
- e.g.
- [x] Bug fix
-->

- [ ] Bug fix
- [ ] Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
- [ ] New Test case
 - [ ] Skipped for non-supported platforms
- [ ] Test case improvement

### Back port request
- [ ] 202012
- [ ] 202205
- [ ] 202305
- [ ] 202311
- [ ] 202405
- [ ] 202411

### Approach
#### What is the motivation for this PR?
Restore vlan configuration by GCU is not clear for dhcp_relay.

#### How did you do it?
Reload config to recover

#### How did you verify/test it?
Run test

#### Any platform specific information?

#### Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

### Documentation
<!--
(If it's a new feature, new test case)
Did you update documentation/Wiki relevant to your implementation?
Link to the wiki page?
-->
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant