[Marvell-teralynx] Add PDDF platform support and HWSKUs to dbmvtx9180#23989
Merged
rlhui merged 8 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom Dec 12, 2025
Merged
[Marvell-teralynx] Add PDDF platform support and HWSKUs to dbmvtx9180#23989rlhui merged 8 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom
rlhui merged 8 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom
Conversation
Collaborator
|
/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
pavannaregundi
changed the title
Contributor
Author
pavannaregundi
force-pushed
the
dbmvtx9180
branch
from
8e87c4a to
cec5344
Compare
Collaborator
|
/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
pavannaregundi
force-pushed
the
dbmvtx9180
branch
from
cec5344 to
ec2ca92
Compare
Collaborator
|
/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Contributor
Author
|
@rlhui Can you please review this PR. |
12 tasks
pavannaregundi
force-pushed
the
dbmvtx9180
branch
from
ec2ca92 to
deb8711
Compare
Collaborator
|
/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Contributor
|
@judyjoseph can you review` |
Signed-off-by: Pavan Naregundi <pnaregundi@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Pavan Naregundi <pnaregundi@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Pavan Naregundi <pnaregundi@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Pavan Naregundi <pnaregundi@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Pavan Naregundi <pnaregundi@marvell.com>
pavannaregundi
force-pushed
the
dbmvtx9180
branch
from
deb8711 to
1207ad1
Compare
Collaborator
|
/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Contributor
Author
|
/azpw run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
Collaborator
|
/AzurePipelines run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
saravanan-nexthop
pushed a commit
to saravanan-nexthop/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2025
This PR introduces the new HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab for the Marvell Teralynx ASIC. What is the motivation for this PR? The purpose of this PR is to extend sonic-mgmt support for the HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab, introduced through sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#23989. How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Ran the SONIC PTF test suite for the new hwsku Any platform specific information? Applicable only for marvell-teralynx platform. Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case? T0 and T1 Signed-off-by: Anandhi Dhanabalan <adhanabalan@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Saravanan <saravanan@nexthop.ai>
gshemesh2
pushed a commit
to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2025
This PR introduces the new HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab for the Marvell Teralynx ASIC. What is the motivation for this PR? The purpose of this PR is to extend sonic-mgmt support for the HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab, introduced through sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#23989. How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Ran the SONIC PTF test suite for the new hwsku Any platform specific information? Applicable only for marvell-teralynx platform. Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case? T0 and T1 Signed-off-by: Anandhi Dhanabalan <adhanabalan@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <gshemesh@nvidia.com>
AharonMalkin
pushed a commit
to AharonMalkin/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2025
This PR introduces the new HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab for the Marvell Teralynx ASIC. What is the motivation for this PR? The purpose of this PR is to extend sonic-mgmt support for the HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab, introduced through sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#23989. How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Ran the SONIC PTF test suite for the new hwsku Any platform specific information? Applicable only for marvell-teralynx platform. Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case? T0 and T1 Signed-off-by: Anandhi Dhanabalan <adhanabalan@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Aharon Malkin <amalkin@nvidia.com>
nissampa
pushed a commit
to nissampa/sonic-mgmt_dpu_test
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2025
This PR introduces the new HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab for the Marvell Teralynx ASIC. What is the motivation for this PR? The purpose of this PR is to extend sonic-mgmt support for the HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab, introduced through sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#23989. How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Ran the SONIC PTF test suite for the new hwsku Any platform specific information? Applicable only for marvell-teralynx platform. Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case? T0 and T1 Signed-off-by: Anandhi Dhanabalan <adhanabalan@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Sampath Kumar <nissampa@cisco.com>
selldinesh
pushed a commit
to selldinesh/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2025
This PR introduces the new HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab for the Marvell Teralynx ASIC. What is the motivation for this PR? The purpose of this PR is to extend sonic-mgmt support for the HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab, introduced through sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#23989. How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Ran the SONIC PTF test suite for the new hwsku Any platform specific information? Applicable only for marvell-teralynx platform. Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case? T0 and T1 Signed-off-by: Anandhi Dhanabalan <adhanabalan@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: selldinesh <dinesh.sellappan@keysight.com>
hdwhdw
pushed a commit
to hdwhdw/sonic-buildimage
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2025
…sonic-net#23989) To add platform service support based on PDDF to DBMVTX9180 board. This PR also adds additional HWSKUs DBMVTX9180 platform. --------- Signed-off-by: Pavan Naregundi <pnaregundi@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Dawei Huang <daweihuang@microsoft.com>
gshemesh2
pushed a commit
to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2025
This PR introduces the new HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab for the Marvell Teralynx ASIC. What is the motivation for this PR? The purpose of this PR is to extend sonic-mgmt support for the HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab, introduced through sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#23989. How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Ran the SONIC PTF test suite for the new hwsku Any platform specific information? Applicable only for marvell-teralynx platform. Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case? T0 and T1 Signed-off-by: Anandhi Dhanabalan <adhanabalan@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <gshemesh@nvidia.com>
gshemesh2
pushed a commit
to gshemesh2/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2025
This PR introduces the new HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab for the Marvell Teralynx ASIC. What is the motivation for this PR? The purpose of this PR is to extend sonic-mgmt support for the HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab, introduced through sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#23989. How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Ran the SONIC PTF test suite for the new hwsku Any platform specific information? Applicable only for marvell-teralynx platform. Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case? T0 and T1 Signed-off-by: Anandhi Dhanabalan <adhanabalan@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Guy Shemesh <gshemesh@nvidia.com>
xwjiang-ms
pushed a commit
to xwjiang-ms/sonic-buildimage
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 22, 2025
…sonic-net#23989) To add platform service support based on PDDF to DBMVTX9180 board. This PR also adds additional HWSKUs DBMVTX9180 platform. --------- Signed-off-by: Pavan Naregundi <pnaregundi@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: xiaweijiang <xiaweijiang@microsoft.com>
vrajeshe
pushed a commit
to Akshath-17/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 4, 2026
This PR introduces the new HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab for the Marvell Teralynx ASIC. What is the motivation for this PR? The purpose of this PR is to extend sonic-mgmt support for the HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab, introduced through sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#23989. How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Ran the SONIC PTF test suite for the new hwsku Any platform specific information? Applicable only for marvell-teralynx platform. Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case? T0 and T1 Signed-off-by: Anandhi Dhanabalan <adhanabalan@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Venkata Gouri Rajesh Etla <vrajeshe@cisco.com>
saiarcot895
pushed a commit
to saiarcot895/sonic-buildimage
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 7, 2026
…sonic-net#23989) To add platform service support based on PDDF to DBMVTX9180 board. This PR also adds additional HWSKUs DBMVTX9180 platform. --------- Signed-off-by: Pavan Naregundi <pnaregundi@marvell.com>
yxieca
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 12, 2026
…#23989) To add platform service support based on PDDF to DBMVTX9180 board. This PR also adds additional HWSKUs DBMVTX9180 platform. --------- Signed-off-by: Pavan Naregundi <pnaregundi@marvell.com>
venu-nexthop
pushed a commit
to venu-nexthop/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2026
This PR introduces the new HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab for the Marvell Teralynx ASIC. What is the motivation for this PR? The purpose of this PR is to extend sonic-mgmt support for the HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab, introduced through sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#23989. How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Ran the SONIC PTF test suite for the new hwsku Any platform specific information? Applicable only for marvell-teralynx platform. Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case? T0 and T1 Signed-off-by: Anandhi Dhanabalan <adhanabalan@marvell.com>
yifan-nexthop
pushed a commit
to nexthop-ai/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2026
This PR introduces the new HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab for the Marvell Teralynx ASIC. What is the motivation for this PR? The purpose of this PR is to extend sonic-mgmt support for the HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab, introduced through sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#23989. How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Ran the SONIC PTF test suite for the new hwsku Any platform specific information? Applicable only for marvell-teralynx platform. Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case? T0 and T1 Signed-off-by: Anandhi Dhanabalan <adhanabalan@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: YiFan Wang <yifan@nexthop.ai>
PriyanshTratiya
pushed a commit
to PriyanshTratiya/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 21, 2026
This PR introduces the new HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab for the Marvell Teralynx ASIC. What is the motivation for this PR? The purpose of this PR is to extend sonic-mgmt support for the HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab, introduced through sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#23989. How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Ran the SONIC PTF test suite for the new hwsku Any platform specific information? Applicable only for marvell-teralynx platform. Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case? T0 and T1 Signed-off-by: Anandhi Dhanabalan <adhanabalan@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Priyansh Tratiya <ptratiya@microsoft.com>
jasonbridges
pushed a commit
to jasonbridges/sonic-buildimage
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2026
…sonic-net#23989) To add platform service support based on PDDF to DBMVTX9180 board. This PR also adds additional HWSKUs DBMVTX9180 platform. --------- Signed-off-by: Pavan Naregundi <pnaregundi@marvell.com>
lakshmi-nexthop
pushed a commit
to lakshmi-nexthop/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 28, 2026
This PR introduces the new HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab for the Marvell Teralynx ASIC. What is the motivation for this PR? The purpose of this PR is to extend sonic-mgmt support for the HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab, introduced through sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#23989. How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Ran the SONIC PTF test suite for the new hwsku Any platform specific information? Applicable only for marvell-teralynx platform. Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case? T0 and T1 Signed-off-by: Anandhi Dhanabalan <adhanabalan@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Yarramaneni <lakshmi@nexthop.ai>
ytzur1
pushed a commit
to ytzur1/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 2, 2026
This PR introduces the new HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab for the Marvell Teralynx ASIC. What is the motivation for this PR? The purpose of this PR is to extend sonic-mgmt support for the HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab, introduced through sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#23989. How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Ran the SONIC PTF test suite for the new hwsku Any platform specific information? Applicable only for marvell-teralynx platform. Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case? T0 and T1 Signed-off-by: Anandhi Dhanabalan <adhanabalan@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Yael Tzur <ytzur@nvidia.com>
abhishek-nexthop
pushed a commit
to nexthop-ai/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2026
This PR introduces the new HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab for the Marvell Teralynx ASIC. What is the motivation for this PR? The purpose of this PR is to extend sonic-mgmt support for the HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab, introduced through sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#23989. How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Ran the SONIC PTF test suite for the new hwsku Any platform specific information? Applicable only for marvell-teralynx platform. Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case? T0 and T1 Signed-off-by: Anandhi Dhanabalan <adhanabalan@marvell.com>
rraghav-cisco
pushed a commit
to rraghav-cisco/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2026
This PR introduces the new HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab for the Marvell Teralynx ASIC. What is the motivation for this PR? The purpose of this PR is to extend sonic-mgmt support for the HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab, introduced through sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#23989. How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Ran the SONIC PTF test suite for the new hwsku Any platform specific information? Applicable only for marvell-teralynx platform. Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case? T0 and T1 Signed-off-by: Anandhi Dhanabalan <adhanabalan@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Raghavendran Ramanathan <rraghav@cisco.com>
mssonicbld
pushed a commit
to mssonicbld/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2026
This PR introduces the new HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab for the Marvell Teralynx ASIC. What is the motivation for this PR? The purpose of this PR is to extend sonic-mgmt support for the HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab, introduced through sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#23989. How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Ran the SONIC PTF test suite for the new hwsku Any platform specific information? Applicable only for marvell-teralynx platform. Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case? T0 and T1 Signed-off-by: Anandhi Dhanabalan <adhanabalan@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: mssonicbld <sonicbld@microsoft.com>
12 tasks
mssonicbld
pushed a commit
to sonic-net/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2026
This PR introduces the new HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab for the Marvell Teralynx ASIC. What is the motivation for this PR? The purpose of this PR is to extend sonic-mgmt support for the HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab, introduced through sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#23989. How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Ran the SONIC PTF test suite for the new hwsku Any platform specific information? Applicable only for marvell-teralynx platform. Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case? T0 and T1 Signed-off-by: Anandhi Dhanabalan <adhanabalan@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: mssonicbld <sonicbld@microsoft.com>
anilal-amd
pushed a commit
to anilal-amd/anilal-forked-sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 19, 2026
This PR introduces the new HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab for the Marvell Teralynx ASIC. What is the motivation for this PR? The purpose of this PR is to extend sonic-mgmt support for the HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab, introduced through sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#23989. How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Ran the SONIC PTF test suite for the new hwsku Any platform specific information? Applicable only for marvell-teralynx platform. Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case? T0 and T1 Signed-off-by: Anandhi Dhanabalan <adhanabalan@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Zhuohui Tan <zhuohui.tan@amd.com>
FengPan-Frank
pushed a commit
to FengPan-Frank/sonic-buildimage
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 6, 2026
…sonic-net#23989) To add platform service support based on PDDF to DBMVTX9180 board. This PR also adds additional HWSKUs DBMVTX9180 platform. --------- Signed-off-by: Pavan Naregundi <pnaregundi@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Feng Pan <fenpan@microsoft.com>
abhishek-nexthop
pushed a commit
to nexthop-ai/sonic-mgmt
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2026
This PR introduces the new HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab for the Marvell Teralynx ASIC. What is the motivation for this PR? The purpose of this PR is to extend sonic-mgmt support for the HWSKU dbmvtx9180_64osfp_128x400G_lab, introduced through sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#23989. How did you do it? How did you verify/test it? Ran the SONIC PTF test suite for the new hwsku Any platform specific information? Applicable only for marvell-teralynx platform. Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case? T0 and T1 Signed-off-by: Anandhi Dhanabalan <adhanabalan@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Abhishek <abhishek@nexthop.ai>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why I did it
To add platform service support based on PDDF to DBMVTX9180 board. This PR also adds additional HWSKUs DBMVTX9180 platform.
Work item tracking
How I did it
How to verify it
Build sonic-marvell-teralynx.bin and verified the image using sonic-mgmt test runs.
Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)
Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)
Description for the changelog
Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes
A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)