Skip to content

Conversation

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

These need to be inlined across crates to avoid showing up as one-instruction
functions in profiles! In the benchmark from #43578 this decreased the
translation item collection step from 30s to 23s, and looks like it also allowed
vectorization elsewhere of the operations!

These need to be inlined across crates to avoid showing up as one-instruction
functions in profiles! In the benchmark from rust-lang#43578 this decreased the
translation item collection step from 30s to 23s, and looks like it also allowed
vectorization elsewhere of the operations!
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @pnkfelix

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@michaelwoerister
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

Nice find!

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 1, 2017

📌 Commit dd371a2 has been approved by michaelwoerister

@michaelwoerister
Copy link
Member

@bors rollup

frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2017
…woerister

rustc: Inline bitwise modification operators

These need to be inlined across crates to avoid showing up as one-instruction
functions in profiles! In the benchmark from rust-lang#43578 this decreased the
translation item collection step from 30s to 23s, and looks like it also allowed
vectorization elsewhere of the operations!
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2017
Rollup of 6 pull requests

- Successful merges: #43389, #43423, #43581, #43585, #43597, #43598
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit dd371a2 into rust-lang:master Aug 2, 2017
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the inline-more branch August 22, 2017 19:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants