Skip to content

Conversation

@betoredhat
Copy link
Contributor

@betoredhat betoredhat commented Jun 25, 2025

SUMMARY

Add extra validation for nooba objects to be Ready

ISSUE TYPE
  • nominal change
Tests

Test-Hint: no-check

@betoredhat betoredhat requested a review from a team as a code owner June 25, 2025 00:47
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 25, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new task was added to the end of the OpenShift storage operator playbook to wait until all CephObjectStoreUser resources in the ocs_storage_namespace are in the "Ready" phase, using retries and status checks.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
roles/odf_setup/tasks/openshift-storage-operator.yml Added a task to wait for all CephObjectStoreUser resources to reach the "Ready" phase with retries.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • manurodriguez
  • tonyskapunk

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 31a2506 and 5f5afdb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • roles/odf_setup/tasks/openshift-storage-operator.yml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • roles/odf_setup/tasks/openshift-storage-operator.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Ansible-lint Check
  • GitHub Check: Sanity Check (stable-2.9)
  • GitHub Check: Sanity Check (stable-2.18)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 33fb704 and b9cb190.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • roles/odf_setup/tasks/openshift-storage-operator.yml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Sanity Check (stable-2.18)
  • GitHub Check: Ansible-lint Check
  • GitHub Check: Sanity Check (stable-2.9)

@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link

@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link

@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator

dcibot commented Jun 25, 2025

@betoredhat
Copy link
Contributor Author

recheck

@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link

@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator

dcibot commented Jun 25, 2025

Copy link
Contributor

@manurodriguez manurodriguez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@betoredhat betoredhat added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 25, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jun 25, 2025
@betoredhat betoredhat added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 25, 2025
@betoredhat betoredhat removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Jun 25, 2025
@betoredhat
Copy link
Contributor Author

recheck

@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator

dcibot commented Jun 25, 2025

from change #716:

  • no check (not a code change)

1 similar comment
@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator

dcibot commented Jun 25, 2025

from change #716:

  • no check (not a code change)

@betoredhat betoredhat added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 25, 2025
@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link

Merged via the queue into main with commit a8caf3b Jun 25, 2025
8 checks passed
@betoredhat betoredhat deleted the check_cosu branch June 25, 2025 19:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants