Skip to content

Conversation

@sudo-suhas
Copy link
Contributor

@sudo-suhas sudo-suhas commented Oct 6, 2022

Related to raystack/meteor#417

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 6, 2022

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 3262550248

  • 1 of 1 (100.0%) changed or added relevant line in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 86.115%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 3225140857: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 4887
Relevant Lines: 5675

💛 - Coveralls

@StewartJingga
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM, just a small concern if ml_feature_table is a good type name? cc: @sudo-suhas @ravisuhag

@sudo-suhas
Copy link
Contributor Author

Do you have a suggestion @StewartJingga? In the PR for adding E2E lineage entities (raystack/proton#193), we had discussed calling it FeatureTable instead of MLFeatureTable but chose to keep it as MLFeatureTable because 'Feature' is an overloaded word that is not clear enough.

@sudo-suhas sudo-suhas force-pushed the type-ml_feature_table branch from f1ae11e to af851a9 Compare October 17, 2022 05:10
@sudo-suhas sudo-suhas force-pushed the type-ml_feature_table branch from af851a9 to ebf6738 Compare October 17, 2022 05:14
@sudo-suhas sudo-suhas changed the title feat: allow ml_feature_table as an asset type feat: allow feature_table as an asset type Oct 17, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@StewartJingga StewartJingga left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@sudo-suhas sudo-suhas merged commit b18d570 into main Oct 27, 2022
@sudo-suhas sudo-suhas deleted the type-ml_feature_table branch October 27, 2022 09:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants