Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.

Tuning openGov parameters for Kusama (round 2)#6409

Closed
adamsteeber wants to merge 15 commits intoparitytech:masterfrom
adamsteeber:adam-tweak-gov2
Closed

Tuning openGov parameters for Kusama (round 2)#6409
adamsteeber wants to merge 15 commits intoparitytech:masterfrom
adamsteeber:adam-tweak-gov2

Conversation

@adamsteeber
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This is in response to the changes requested in PR 6398 (closed to resynchronize fork).

I'm actually quite glad Gavin requested an analysis of the changes since I found some major flaws in my initial configuration. After a good risk analysis, I arrived at this configuration. I believe it's a good compromise for making things faster and a bit more affordable across the board. It also increases security by making enactment and confirmation periods longer in the more consequential tracks.

I hope these changes are found to be more robust, informed, and conscientious.

@adamsteeber
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Question: would the maxQueued constant need to be increase to the largest max_deciding parameter?

$1 is just too low imo
Spend limits need to be much lower as another line of defense for treasury funds
I agree with most of [PR 6416](#6416), however there were a few things that I think should change:

- increase capacity of admin tracks while lowering the decision deposit
- make confirmation periods for all spender tracks equal to the treasurer track. No reason why a big spend should take longer to confirm than a root call.
@adamsteeber
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

adamsteeber commented Dec 12, 2022

Adherence to a lot of PR 6416. Still think that:

  • submission deposit should be at least 1 KSM
  • spend limits need to be lower
  • increase admin tracks' capacity while lower decision deposits
  • make the spending tracks' confirmation periods the same as treasurer.

@adamsteeber adamsteeber reopened this Dec 12, 2022
@paritytech-cicd-pr
Copy link
Copy Markdown

The CI pipeline was cancelled due to failure one of the required jobs.
Job name: test-linux-stable
Logs: https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot/-/jobs/2156153

@adamsteeber
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Outdated PR

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants