union with builtin variant name bug #746
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Before this PR
the following properties are generated on the union class:
however a type error occurs when evaluating the return type of the
doublemethod where thefloattype is interpreted as the class' property, i.e., the following error is thrown on import:After this PR
float fields/variants are sanitized and the new test case (and all existing test cases) pass
==COMMIT_MSG==
==COMMIT_MSG==
Possible downsides?
Technically this is a break for clients who were accessing fields/variants with the name "float" (notably this behavior was already the case for str, bool, int and other builtin types) but since those clients would have been broken we don't expect this to actually be an issue for any consumers.