For umitools use only umi_dedup.sorted.log in multiqc_report #1571
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
|
This looks good, thank you @idot |
pinin4fjords
approved these changes
Aug 13, 2025
pinin4fjords
changed the title
pinin4fjords
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fixes #1570 by ignoring umi_dedup.transcriptome.sorted.log
I choose umi_dedup.sorted.log because the numbers are the most relatable ones with the input read counts
If you really would want to display also the values of umi_dedup.transcriptome.sorted.log you would have to change the sample pattern mask