Skip to content

Conversation

@jmontleon
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@rayfordj
Copy link

/lgtm

Copy link
Member

@djzager djzager left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

visack

oauth_access_rule: "{{ oauth_default_openshift_sar if oauth_provider == 'openshift' }}"
oauth_image_fqin: "{{ lookup('env', 'RELATED_IMAGE_OAUTH_PROXY') }}"
oauth_ssl_port: 9443
oauth_ssl_port: 8443
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is it? Why?

Copy link
Member Author

@jmontleon jmontleon Mar 19, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added a comment on the PR for main, apologies, I did not include it on this one:
The external access network policy allows 8080 and 8443. So using 8443 instead of 9443 allows everything to work.

I think my PR to add the oauth proxy predated the networkpolicy, so the auth proxy listening on 9443 at the time worked. That is no longer true as the traffic gets blocked. Alternatively I could have added port 9443 to the networkpolicy, but I went with this route.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

heh. I saw it and didn't connect them.

@jmontleon jmontleon merged commit 6ff3756 into konveyor:release-0.6 Mar 19, 2025
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants