Add SPM build to CI

[yurishkuro]

Which problem is this PR solving?

• Part of Create integration tests for SPM #5608
• SPM Makefile was calling a target that was removed in previous refactoring

Description of the changes

• Build the image directly instead of calling much more expensive target
• Use workflow added in Add SPM integration tests #5640 to run the build
• Change crossdock target to not build debug image with devle, which is expensive

How was this change tested?

• make build && make dev

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.38%. Comparing base (3f6f5fe) to head (834c684).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5663   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.38%   96.38%           
=======================================
  Files         329      329           
  Lines       16056    16056           
=======================================
  Hits        15475    15475           
  Misses        404      404           
  Partials      177      177           

Flag	Coverage Δ
badger_v1	8.04% <ø> (ø)
badger_v2	1.92% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-3.x-v1	16.60% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-3.x-v2	1.84% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v1	16.60% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v2	1.84% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-7.x-v1	18.87% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
elasticsearch-8.x-v1	19.06% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-8.x-v2	19.05% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
grpc_v1	9.47% <ø> (ø)
grpc_v2	7.49% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
kafka	9.76% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-1.x-v1	18.91% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
opensearch-2.x-v1	18.92% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
opensearch-2.x-v2	18.92% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
unittests	94.23% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.