Skip to content

Conversation

@FlamingSaint
Copy link
Member

Which problem is this PR solving?

Description of the changes

  • Added new target docker-images-jaeger-backend in Makefile.Integration.mk

How was this change tested?

  • make build

Checklist

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.36%. Comparing base (1c1f22b) to head (7eb262e).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5658      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.37%   96.36%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         327      327              
  Lines       16028    16028              
==========================================
- Hits        15447    15445       -2     
- Misses        404      405       +1     
- Partials      177      178       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
badger_v1 8.04% <ø> (ø)
badger_v2 1.93% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-3.x-v1 16.60% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-3.x-v2 1.85% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v1 16.60% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v2 1.85% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-7.x-v1 18.87% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-8.x-v1 19.05% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
elasticsearch-8.x-v2 19.05% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
grpc_v1 9.47% <ø> (ø)
grpc_v2 7.52% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
kafka 9.76% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-1.x-v1 18.92% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-2.x-v1 18.92% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-2.x-v2 18.92% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
unittests 94.21% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@FlamingSaint FlamingSaint marked this pull request as ready for review June 19, 2024 00:12
@FlamingSaint FlamingSaint requested a review from a team as a code owner June 19, 2024 00:12
@FlamingSaint FlamingSaint requested a review from albertteoh June 19, 2024 00:12
Signed-off-by: FlamingSaint <[email protected]>
docker buildx build --target $(TARGET) \
--tag $(DOCKER_NAMESPACE)/$$component$(SUFFIX):${DOCKER_TAG} \
--build-arg base_image=$(BASE_IMAGE) \
--build-arg debug_image=$(DEBUG_IMAGE) \
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should I use the BASE_IMAGE here ?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You could try. I see that the way Dockerfile is designed you cannot skip building debug image. But the main time is actually spent on building the base debug image (where we need to download and build delve), so maybe it's ok.

@yurishkuro
Copy link
Member

Superseded by #5663

@yurishkuro yurishkuro closed this Jun 19, 2024
@FlamingSaint FlamingSaint deleted the makefile-spm branch June 24, 2024 04:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants