Implemented AsyncInMemoryDatabase::set in terms of ::batch_set

[cryo28]

The implementation of AsyncInMemoryDatabase::set and batch_set contain a lot of duplicate code.

Tested with:

cargo test test_in_memory_db

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.43%. Comparing base (24b11de) to head (d759c17).

Files	Patch %	Lines
akd/src/storage/memory.rs	50.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #425      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.99%   88.43%   +0.43%     
==========================================
  Files          39       39              
  Lines        9054     9198     +144     
==========================================
+ Hits         7967     8134     +167     
+ Misses       1087     1064      -23     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[kevinlewi]

Awesome, thanks and LGTM. However, seems like there is a clippy error that is on a line which is unrelated to your changes, but if you can fix it so that CI tests pass, that would be great!

https://github.com/facebook/akd/actions/runs/8195091568/job/22412621676?pr=425#step:4:556

[kevinlewi]

Sorry, I landed #426 first which also fixed the clippy error -- can you rebase on main and force-push again? Should fix the CI issue

[cryo28]

It seems like force updates don't re-trigger workflows. Not sure what I should do? Should I recreate the PR or add some dummy commit to the existing one?