Skip to content

Conversation

@boegel
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel commented Mar 18, 2019

(created using eb --new-pr)
marked WIP since this may need to be change into a single easyconfig that leverages the upcoming multi-Python support...

@boegel boegel added the new label Mar 18, 2019
@boegel boegel added this to the next release (3.8.2) milestone Mar 18, 2019
@easybuilders easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Mar 19, 2019
@boegel boegel force-pushed the 20190318175128_new_pr_SciPy-bundle201903 branch from eb12cd6 to a5c6070 Compare March 19, 2019 10:10
….7.15 + 3.7.2 into a single easyconfig using multi_deps
@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Mar 26, 2019

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
node3100.skitty.os - Linux centos linux 7.6.1810, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/dcb4dc0a496120e2532d34c7bc7ab5a8 for a full test report.

@boegel boegel changed the title {lang}[intel/2019a] SciPy-bundle v2019.03 w/ Python 2.7.15 + 3.7.2 (WIP) {lang}[intel/2019a] SciPy-bundle v2019.03 w/ Python 2.7.15 + 3.7.2 Apr 2, 2019
@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Apr 2, 2019

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2102.delcatty.os - Linux centos linux 7.6.1810, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/21453e6ed3e049fb19f2629304effe13 for a full test report.

Copy link
Contributor

@akesandgren akesandgren left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@akesandgren
Copy link
Contributor

Going in, thanks @boegel!

@akesandgren akesandgren merged commit 4d45ff8 into easybuilders:develop Apr 2, 2019
@boegel boegel deleted the 20190318175128_new_pr_SciPy-bundle201903 branch April 2, 2019 11:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants