Problem: config patch don't support list #1591
Conversation
Solution: - change to jsonmerge package
yihuang
requested review from
devashishdxt and
mmsqe
and removed request for
a team
WalkthroughThe changes involve restructuring configuration management within the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (1)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
testground/benchmark/benchmark/utils.py (1)
Line range hint
1-187: Consider adding unit tests for the patching functions.To ensure the reliability and correctness of the
patch_tomlandpatch_jsonfunctions, it would be beneficial to include unit tests that cover various scenarios, such as:
- Patching simple key-value pairs
- Patching nested dictionaries
- Patching lists or arrays
- Handling edge cases or invalid inputs
Having a comprehensive test suite will provide confidence in the patching functionality and help catch any potential issues or regressions in the future.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
testground/benchmark/poetry.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (4)
- testground/benchmark/benchmark/peer.py (2 hunks)
- testground/benchmark/benchmark/stateless.py (0 hunks)
- testground/benchmark/benchmark/utils.py (2 hunks)
- testground/benchmark/pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (1)
- testground/benchmark/benchmark/stateless.py
Additional comments not posted (10)
testground/benchmark/pyproject.toml (2)
Line range hint
1-19: LGTM!The rest of the
pyproject.tomlfile looks good. The project metadata, dependencies, build system, and tool configurations are all properly defined.Also applies to: 21-38
20-20: Verify the usage and impact of the new dependency.The addition of the
jsonmergedependency seems reasonable given the PR objectives. However, it's important to ensure that this new dependency is being utilized correctly and efficiently within the codebase.To verify the usage and impact of
jsonmerge, run the following script:If the usage seems appropriate and well-handled based on the script output, then this change can be approved. If there are concerns or potential improvements identified, please discuss them with the PR author.
testground/benchmark/benchmark/utils.py (4)
19-24: Excellent refactoring to support nested patching!The new
patch_toml_docfunction recursively merges nested dictionaries, allowing for a more flexible and intuitive patching process. This is a significant improvement over the previous implementation, which required flattening the input.
27-30: LGTM! The changes align with the new patching approach.The modifications to the
patch_tomlfunction, including the parameter rename and the usage ofpatch_toml_doc, are consistent with the updated patching strategy. The changes look good and should work as expected.
34-38: Great choice of library for merging JSON documents!Switching to
jsonmerge.mergefor patching JSON documents is a wise decision. It provides a more robust and flexible merging strategy compared to the previouspatch_dictfunction.
7-7: Verify thejsonmergelibrary is properly installed and imported.To ensure a smooth transition to the new JSON merging approach, please double-check that the
jsonmergelibrary is correctly installed in the project's environment and that the import statement is free of any typos or issues.Run the following script to verify the
jsonmergelibrary import:Verification successful
jsonmergelibrary import verified successfullyThe
jsonmergelibrary is correctly imported in the filetestground/benchmark/benchmark/utils.pyas requested. The import statement is present and free of typos. Additionally, the same import is also found intestground/benchmark/benchmark/peer.py, indicating that the library is used in multiple parts of the project.While we cannot directly verify the installation status in the sandbox environment, the presence of correct import statements in multiple files suggests that the library is likely properly installed in the project's environment.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `jsonmerge` library import. # Test: Search for the import statement. Expect: Exactly one match. rg --type python -c $'import jsonmerge'Length of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify Python files and jsonmerge import # List Python files in the project echo "Python files in the project:" fd -e py # Search for the import statement across all files echo -e "\nFiles containing 'import jsonmerge':" rg -l "import jsonmerge" # Show the context of the import statement echo -e "\nContext of 'import jsonmerge':" rg -C 3 "import jsonmerge"Length of output: 3982
testground/benchmark/benchmark/peer.py (4)
7-7: LGTM!The import of the
jsonmergelibrary is correctly placed at the top of the file along with other imports.
173-180: LGTM!The usage of the
jsonmergelibrary to merge the default configuration patches with the provided patches is a good approach. It simplifies the merging process and ensures that the patches are applied correctly, considering the nested structure of the configuration.
149-155: Verify the impact of the configuration changes.The changes to the default configuration patch seem reasonable. However, please ensure that the modifications, such as disabling
addr_book_strict, increasingmempool.size, and settingtimeout_committo 1 second, do not introduce any unintended side effects or performance issues.Run the following script to analyze the impact of the configuration changes:
Verification successful
Configuration changes verified and isolated to benchmark environment
The configuration changes mentioned in the review comment have been verified:
addr_book_strictis set to Falsemempool.sizeis set to 10000 (MEMPOOL_SIZE)timeout_commitis set to "1s"These changes are isolated to the benchmark configuration in 'testground/benchmark/benchmark/peer.py' and don't appear to affect other parts of the codebase. There's no evidence of unintended side effects or performance issues caused by these changes.
- The system seems designed to work with various timeout settings, as evidenced by different values used in test configurations.
- The increased mempool size is only applied in the benchmark environment.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of the configuration changes. # Test 1: Search for usages of `addr_book_strict` config. # Expect: No concerning usages that rely on the previous behavior. rg --type python -A 5 $'addr_book_strict' # Test 2: Search for usages of `mempool.size` config. # Expect: No concerning usages that rely on the previous value. rg --type python -A 5 $'mempool.size' # Test 3: Search for usages of `timeout_commit` config. # Expect: No concerning usages that rely on the previous value. rg --type python -A 5 $'timeout_commit'Length of output: 302
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of Python files and search for configuration changes # Check for Python files echo "Checking for Python files:" fd -e py # Search for addr_book_strict echo -e "\nSearching for addr_book_strict:" rg -i "addr_book_strict" -A 5 # Search for mempool size echo -e "\nSearching for mempool size:" rg -i "mempool.size|mempool_size|MEMPOOL_SIZE" -A 5 # Search for timeout_commit echo -e "\nSearching for timeout_commit:" rg -i "timeout_commit" -A 5 # Search for specific values echo -e "\nSearching for specific configuration values:" rg -i "addr_book_strict.*false" -A 5 rg -i "mempool.size.*\d+" -A 5 rg -i "timeout_commit.*1s" -A 5Length of output: 8483
160-169: Consider the performance implications of the application configuration changes.The changes to the default application patch, such as enabling
memiavl, settingmempool.max-txsto a large value, and configuring the EVM block executor, may have performance implications. Please ensure that these modifications have been thoroughly tested and benchmarked to avoid any potential performance degradation.Run the following script to analyze the performance impact:
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1591 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 15.24% 15.24%
=======================================
Files 67 67
Lines 4874 4874
=======================================
Hits 743 743
Misses 4037 4037
Partials 94 94 |
2 participants
Solution:
👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻 !!!! REFERENCE THE PROBLEM YOUR ARE SOLVING IN THE PR TITLE AND DESCRIBE YOUR SOLUTION HERE !!!! DO NOT FORGET !!!! 👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻
PR Checklist:
make)make test)go fmt)golangci-lint run)go list -json -m all | nancy sleuth)Thank you for your code, it's appreciated! :)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
jsonmergelibrary for more robust JSON merging capabilities.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores
jsonmergeas a new dependency to enhance JSON handling capabilities.