use existing libunwind on linux #160
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service. I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR ( |
Since libunwind is a specification and assuming no major bugs, we can use the existing non-llvm libunwind also for libc++abi; c.f. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/llvmorg-18.1.8/clang/docs/Toolchain.rst#libunwind-nongnuorg
…nda-forge-pinning 2024.07.10.03.09.24
h-vetinari
requested review from
SylvainCorlay,
beckermr,
inducer,
isuruf,
jakirkham and
timsnyder
as code owners
This was referenced Jul 10, 2024
Merged
2 tasks
xhochy
approved these changes
Jul 12, 2024
5 tasks
Member
Author
|
Obsoleted by #167 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Not sure if this is possible, but it would be nice... Follow-up to #155
The LLVM docs at least make this sound possible.
Closes #161