-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
Reinstate libcxx version that matches compiler #134
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service. I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR ( |
|
Waiting for conda-forge/libcxx-feedstock#160 |
|
Draft at least until we fix conda-forge/libcxx-feedstock#162 |
|
Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service. I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR ( |
|
@conda-forge/clang-compiler-activation, with this PR we're finally ready to go back to the way things worked before the macOS 10.13 bump caused things to diverge for a while. PTAL :) |
|
Gentle ping @conda-forge/clang-compiler-activation :) |
isuruf
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's keep libcxx_major jinja variable and set it to version? Reduces churn now and in the future too.
This reverts commit ebcef3e.
|
Hi! This is the friendly conda-forge automerge bot! I considered the following status checks when analyzing this PR:
Thus the PR was passing and merged! Have a great day! |
We've finally caught back up after conda-forge/libcxx-feedstock#155 got merged. 🙃
C.f. list in #131 (resp. #113 before #128)