Skip to content

abci: ADR-008 Merge abci-rs into tendermint-rs#510

Closed
devashishdxt wants to merge 5 commits intocometbft:masterfrom
devashishdxt:abci-rs-adr
Closed

abci: ADR-008 Merge abci-rs into tendermint-rs#510
devashishdxt wants to merge 5 commits intocometbft:masterfrom
devashishdxt:abci-rs-adr

Conversation

@devashishdxt
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@xla xla self-assigned this Aug 11, 2020
@xla xla added abci documentation Improvements or additions to documentation labels Aug 11, 2020
@xla xla changed the title ARD-008 Merge abci-rs into tendermint-rs abci: ADR-008 Merge abci-rs into tendermint-rs Aug 11, 2020
xla
xla previously approved these changes Aug 11, 2020
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@xla xla left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good and helps contextualize the upcoming merge. Small wording suggestions inline.

@tomtau tomtau mentioned this pull request Aug 12, 2020
Co-authored-by: Alexander Simmerl <a.simmerl@gmail.com>
devashishdxt and others added 3 commits August 13, 2020 08:48
Co-authored-by: Alexander Simmerl <a.simmerl@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alexander Simmerl <a.simmerl@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alexander Simmerl <a.simmerl@gmail.com>

### Negative/Neutral

- Developer is forced to use `async` Rust.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ebuchman ebuchman Sep 20, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I really like what is described in (1) here and seems to be a possible convergence point amidst all the discussion to work towards, and something that is done in other rust crates, where the core is implemented synchronously and an async wrapper is provided. The extra maintenance cost for the wrapper seems minimal compared to the user/flexibility benefit, especially if the synchronous core is simple enough.

Would it make sense for abci2 to be used as such a core and adapt abci-rs to be an async wrapper around it, and expose both ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

abci documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants