Skip to content

Conversation

@Havvy
Copy link

@Havvy Havvy commented Jul 11, 2021

In #2034, the Remove Command did not get the same treatment as the rest of the commands. There's no discussion saying it shouldn't have public fields, so I am assuming it was an oversight. This fixes that oversight.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the S-Needs-Triage This issue needs to be labelled label Jul 11, 2021
@alice-i-cecile alice-i-cecile added C-Bug An unexpected or incorrect behavior A-ECS Entities, components, systems, and events C-Usability A targeted quality-of-life change that makes Bevy easier to use and removed S-Needs-Triage This issue needs to be labelled labels Jul 11, 2021
@mockersf
Copy link
Member

could you comment on #2373 if you're OK with the license change?

@mockersf
Copy link
Member

bors try

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2021
@mockersf mockersf added the S-Ready-For-Final-Review This PR has been approved by the community. It's ready for a maintainer to consider merging it label Jul 11, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Jul 11, 2021

try

Build failed:

@Havvy
Copy link
Author

Havvy commented Jul 11, 2021

Build failed due to a network error.

@alice-i-cecile
Copy link
Member

bors try

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Jul 11, 2021

try

Build failed:

@Havvy
Copy link
Author

Havvy commented Jul 12, 2021

Build failed again due to a network issue, although this time with a different crate, but in the same stage.

@Ratysz
Copy link
Contributor

Ratysz commented Jul 12, 2021

bors try

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Jul 12, 2021

@mockersf
Copy link
Member

bors r+

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2021
In #2034, the `Remove` Command did not get the same treatment as the rest of the commands. There's no discussion saying it shouldn't have public fields, so I am assuming it was an oversight. This fixes that oversight.
@bors bors bot changed the title Make Remove Command's fields public [Merged by Bors] - Make Remove Command's fields public Jul 12, 2021
@bors bors bot closed this Jul 12, 2021
ostwilkens pushed a commit to ostwilkens/bevy that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2021
In bevyengine#2034, the `Remove` Command did not get the same treatment as the rest of the commands. There's no discussion saying it shouldn't have public fields, so I am assuming it was an oversight. This fixes that oversight.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-ECS Entities, components, systems, and events C-Bug An unexpected or incorrect behavior C-Usability A targeted quality-of-life change that makes Bevy easier to use S-Ready-For-Final-Review This PR has been approved by the community. It's ready for a maintainer to consider merging it

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants