Skip to content

lab5 - tx monitoring implementation#1

Closed
arfeigin wants to merge 3 commits intomasterfrom
lab5_swss
Closed

lab5 - tx monitoring implementation#1
arfeigin wants to merge 3 commits intomasterfrom
lab5_swss

Conversation

@arfeigin
Copy link
Owner

@arfeigin arfeigin commented May 8, 2022

What I did
Implementation of TX error monitoring as part of the orchagent.
Why I did it
NE training - lab5.
How I verified it
Manual testing.
Details if related

arfeigin and others added 3 commits May 8, 2022 13:22
then checking tx errors counters use a reference instead a local copy that won't make an actual impact.
arfeigin pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2022
Currently, ASAN sometimes reports the BufferOrch::m_buffer_type_maps and QosOrch::m_qos_maps as leaked. However, their lifetime is the lifetime of a process so they are not really 'leaked'.
This also adds a simple way to add more suppressions later if required.

Example of ASAN report:

Direct leak of 48 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7f96aa952d30 in operator new(unsigned long) (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0xead30)
    #1 0x55ca1da9f789 in __static_initialization_and_destruction_0 /__w/2/s/orchagent/bufferorch.cpp:39
    #2 0x55ca1daa02af in _GLOBAL__sub_I_bufferorch.cpp /__w/2/s/orchagent/bufferorch.cpp:1321
    #3 0x55ca1e2a9cd4  (/usr/bin/orchagent+0xe89cd4)

Direct leak of 48 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7f96aa952d30 in operator new(unsigned long) (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0xead30)
    #1 0x55ca1da6d2da in __static_initialization_and_destruction_0 /__w/2/s/orchagent/qosorch.cpp:80
    #2 0x55ca1da6ecf2 in _GLOBAL__sub_I_qosorch.cpp /__w/2/s/orchagent/qosorch.cpp:2000
    #3 0x55ca1e2a9cd4  (/usr/bin/orchagent+0xe89cd4)

- What I did
Added an lsan suppression config with static variable leak suppression

- Why I did it
To suppress ASAN false positives

- How I verified it
Run a test that produces the static variable leaks report and checked that report has these leaks suppressed.

Signed-off-by: Yakiv Huryk <yhuryk@nvidia.com>
arfeigin pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2022
Currently, ASAN sometimes reports the BufferOrch::m_buffer_type_maps and QosOrch::m_qos_maps as leaked. However, their lifetime is the lifetime of a process so they are not really 'leaked'.
This also adds a simple way to add more suppressions later if required.

Example of ASAN report:

Direct leak of 48 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7f96aa952d30 in operator new(unsigned long) (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0xead30)
    #1 0x55ca1da9f789 in __static_initialization_and_destruction_0 /__w/2/s/orchagent/bufferorch.cpp:39
    #2 0x55ca1daa02af in _GLOBAL__sub_I_bufferorch.cpp /__w/2/s/orchagent/bufferorch.cpp:1321
    #3 0x55ca1e2a9cd4  (/usr/bin/orchagent+0xe89cd4)

Direct leak of 48 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7f96aa952d30 in operator new(unsigned long) (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0xead30)
    #1 0x55ca1da6d2da in __static_initialization_and_destruction_0 /__w/2/s/orchagent/qosorch.cpp:80
    #2 0x55ca1da6ecf2 in _GLOBAL__sub_I_qosorch.cpp /__w/2/s/orchagent/qosorch.cpp:2000
    #3 0x55ca1e2a9cd4  (/usr/bin/orchagent+0xe89cd4)

- What I did
Added an lsan suppression config with static variable leak suppression

- Why I did it
To suppress ASAN false positives

- How I verified it
Run a test that produces the static variable leaks report and checked that report has these leaks suppressed.

Signed-off-by: Yakiv Huryk <yhuryk@nvidia.com>
arfeigin pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2022
…onic-net#2446)

* Add events publish

* Added header file

* signature fix

* syntax

* syntax

* syntax

* syntax

* syntax

* syntax

* Updated fake code

* Remove if and log messages for event_publish

* Remove if and log messages for event_publish (#1)

* Remove event_handle_t from signature and add globally

* Remove extern orchdaemon.cpp

* Revert unneeded changes

Co-authored-by: zbud-msft <zainbudhwani@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Zain Budhwani <99770260+zbud-msft@users.noreply.github.com>
@arfeigin arfeigin closed this Nov 22, 2022
arfeigin pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2024
**What I did**

Fix the Mem Leak by moving the raw pointers in type_maps to use smart pointers

**Why I did it**

```
Indirect leak of 83776 byte(s) in 476 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7f0a2a414647 in operator new(unsigned long) ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_new_delete.cpp:99
    #1 0x5555590cc923 in __gnu_cxx::new_allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >::allocate(unsigned long, void const*) /usr/include/c++/10/ext/new_allocator.h:115
    #2 0x5555590cc923 in std::allocator_traits, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > > >::allocate(std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >&, unsigned long) /usr/include/c++/10/bits/alloc_traits.h:460
    #3 0x5555590cc923 in std::_Rb_tree, std::allocator >, std::pair, std::allocator > const, referenced_object>, std::_Select1st, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> >, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >::_M_get_node() /usr/include/c++/10/bits/stl_tree.h:584
    #4 0x5555590cc923 in std::_Rb_tree_node, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> >* std::_Rb_tree, std::allocator >, std::pair, std::allocator > const, referenced_object>, std::_Select1st, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> >, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >::_M_create_node, std::allocator > const&>, std::tuple<> >(std::piecewise_construct_t const&, std::tuple, std::allocator > const&>&&, std::tuple<>&&) /usr/include/c++/10/bits/stl_tree.h:634
    #5 0x5555590cc923 in std::_Rb_tree_iterator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > std::_Rb_tree, std::allocator >, std::pair, std::allocator > const, referenced_object>, std::_Select1st, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> >, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >::_M_emplace_hint_unique, std::allocator > const&>, std::tuple<> >(std::_Rb_tree_const_iterator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> >, std::piecewise_construct_t const&, std::tuple, std::allocator > const&>&&, std::tuple<>&&) /usr/include/c++/10/bits/stl_tree.h:2461
    #6 0x5555590e8757 in std::map, std::allocator >, referenced_object, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >::operator[](std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&) /usr/include/c++/10/bits/stl_map.h:501
    #7 0x5555590d48b0 in Orch::setObjectReference(std::map, std::allocator >, std::map, std::allocator >, referenced_object, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >*, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, std::map, std::allocator >, referenced_object, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >*> > >&, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&) orchagent/orch.cpp:450
    #8 0x5555594ff66b in QosOrch::handleQueueTable(Consumer&, std::tuple, std::allocator >, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator >, std::vector, std::allocator >, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator >, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > > > > >&) orchagent/qosorch.cpp:1763
    #9 0x5555594edbd6 in QosOrch::doTask(Consumer&) orchagent/qosorch.cpp:2179
    #10 0x5555590c8743 in Consumer::drain() orchagent/orch.cpp:241
    #11 0x5555590c8743 in Consumer::drain() orchagent/orch.cpp:238
    #12 0x5555590c8743 in Consumer::execute() orchagent/orch.cpp:235
    sonic-net#13 0x555559090dad in OrchDaemon::start() orchagent/orchdaemon.cpp:755
    sonic-net#14 0x555558e9be25 in main orchagent/main.cpp:766
    sonic-net#15 0x7f0a299b6d09 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x23d09)
```
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant