Skip to content

Conversation

@jteagles
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@tez-yetus
Copy link

💔 -1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 21m 39s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌ test4tests 0m 0s The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
_ master Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 8m 28s master passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 31s master passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.25+9-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu122.04
+1 💚 compile 0m 31s master passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_432-8u432-gaus1-0ubuntu222.04-ga
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 54s master passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.25+9-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu122.04
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 23s master passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_432-8u432-gaus1-0ubuntu222.04-ga
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 0m 27s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 16s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.25+9-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu122.04
+1 💚 javac 0m 16s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 15s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_432-8u432-gaus1-0ubuntu222.04-ga
+1 💚 javac 0m 15s the patch passed
+1 💚 whitespace 0m 0s The patch has no whitespace issues.
+1 💚 xml 0m 1s The patch has no ill-formed XML file.
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 9s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.25+9-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu122.04
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 9s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_432-8u432-gaus1-0ubuntu222.04-ga
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 2m 55s tez-aux-services in the patch passed.
+1 💚 asflicense 0m 18s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
37m 47s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.47 ServerAPI=1.47 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-385/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #385
Optional Tests dupname asflicense javac javadoc unit xml compile
uname Linux 581041a1d4a7 5.15.0-126-generic #136-Ubuntu SMP Wed Nov 6 10:38:22 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality personality/tez.sh
git revision master / ca15119
Default Java Private Build-1.8.0_432-8u432-gaus1-0ubuntu222.04-ga
Multi-JDK versions /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.25+9-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu122.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_432-8u432-gaus1-0ubuntu222.04-ga
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-385/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 1552 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules C: tez-plugins/tez-aux-services U: tez-plugins/tez-aux-services
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-385/1/console
versions git=2.34.1 maven=3.6.3
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@abstractdog abstractdog self-requested a review December 20, 2024 08:54
<exclude>javax.security.**</exclude>
<exclude>javax.net.**</exclude>
</excludes>
</relocation>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can see the following jars are currently relocated.

  • org/apache/tez/shaded/javax/annotation/
  • org/apache/tez/shaded/javax/xml/bind/

I guess they come from Hadoop. So, "As javax is part of the jdk:" in the ticket might not be correct. Personally, I don't have any objections to exclude javax, though

+- org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-yarn-api:jar:3.3.6:provided
|  +- javax.xml.bind:jaxb-api:jar:2.2.11:compile

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@okumin , thanks for the clarification
@abstractdog , @okumin is there any other change needed before +1?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm fine with this change +1

@jteagles jteagles merged commit 871866e into apache:master Jan 16, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants