Skip to content

Conversation

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

@rxin rxin commented Jun 8, 2014

Adding a paragraph clarifying a weird behavior in RangePartitioner.

See also #549.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build triggered.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build started.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/15548/

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor Author

rxin commented Jun 9, 2014

Ok merging this in master.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 219dc00 Jun 9, 2014
pdeyhim pushed a commit to pdeyhim/spark-1 that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2014
Adding a paragraph clarifying a weird behavior in RangePartitioner.

See also apache#549.

Author: Reynold Xin <[email protected]>

Closes apache#1012 from rxin/partitioner-doc and squashes the following commits:

6f0109e [Reynold Xin] SPARK-1628 follow up: Improve RangePartitioner's documentation.
@rxin rxin deleted the partitioner-doc branch August 13, 2014 08:03
xiliu82 pushed a commit to xiliu82/spark that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2014
Adding a paragraph clarifying a weird behavior in RangePartitioner.

See also apache#549.

Author: Reynold Xin <[email protected]>

Closes apache#1012 from rxin/partitioner-doc and squashes the following commits:

6f0109e [Reynold Xin] SPARK-1628 follow up: Improve RangePartitioner's documentation.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants