Skip to content

Conversation

@donmccurdy
Copy link
Member

Per #3793.

What do you think of just marking it deprecated for a release before we remove anything? Or better to just go for it?

@ngokevin
Copy link
Member

I'm okay just going for it. I haven't seen COLLADA use, and many of the popular asset places don't export them now. Also need to remove from examples.

@donmccurdy donmccurdy added this to the 0.9.0 milestone Oct 19, 2018
@donmccurdy
Copy link
Member Author

Ok, what's our timeline for 0.9.0? I'll try to get it removed but if we need to make a release sometime sooner feel free to just merge this.

@ngokevin
Copy link
Member

I think realistically 2-3 weeks.

@dmarcos
Copy link
Member

dmarcos commented Oct 22, 2018

Happy to remove it. 0.9.0 is a good heads up before 1.0.0 when we should consolidate to glTF. Thanks for staying on top.

@ngokevin
Copy link
Member

@donmccurdy Want to execute the removal? Also want to have a go at reviewing some of my recent PRs?

@donmccurdy
Copy link
Member Author

I'm working on the collada-model removal now. I think it will require merging something like #3757 to keep consistent colors, as we replace the .dae examples with .glb. #3757 is still waiting for me to make changes at this point too I think. 😅

@ngokevin
Copy link
Member

Going with #3866

@ngokevin ngokevin closed this Dec 15, 2018
@donmccurdy donmccurdy deleted the deprecate-collada-model branch January 10, 2019 06:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants