Update to Bevy 0.10

[soerenmeier]

I think everything should be working as in the previous version but I haven't used this crate myself.

[faulesocke]

You've added windows line endings. You should probably check your git configuration.

[soerenmeier]

Since the last force push they should be gone. Some bug with sublime merge.

[alice-i-cecile]

This migration appears to be done correctly :) Testing this out in Leafwing-Studios/Emergence#500

[faulesocke]

Ah interesting, I got fooled by git. All files are with Windows line-endings but git show only shows them in the lines that were added, not in removed or untouched lines.

Also played around with the module a bit and it seems to work just fine with 0.10!

[Malax]

I've been using this branch for some days now and it just worked for me :)

[dimvoly]

In lib.rs on lines 410 and 412, you'd want to cover the case where the entity is visible, but visibility is not inherited:

if let RaycastMethod::Screenspace(_) = pick_source.cast_method {
		(visibility == Visibility::Inherited && comp_visibility.is_visible())
		||
		(visibility == Visibility::Visible && comp_visibility.is_visible())
	} else {
		visibility == Visibility::Inherited
		||
		visibility == Visibility::Visible
};

As it is now, it's possible to end up with visible entities that you don't raycast to (and therefore can't pick via bevy_mod_picking in my use case).

[soerenmeier]

You're right, I wen't with the migration guide but it makes more sense, to take into account Visibility::Visible.
I took the liberty to remove manually checking Visibility since that is already done in the visibility_propagate_system of bevy and now rely on ComputedVisibility.

[luke-biel]

@aevyrie any chance this gets merged?

[aevyrie]

Thanks @soerenmeier for your effort here, and everyone else for your patience. ❤️