Skip to content

Migrate from Picasso to Coil#13272

Merged
theimpulson merged 3 commits intoTeamNewPipe:devfrom
theimpulson:coilport
Feb 22, 2026
Merged

Migrate from Picasso to Coil#13272
theimpulson merged 3 commits intoTeamNewPipe:devfrom
theimpulson:coilport

Conversation

@theimpulson
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What is it?

  • Bugfix (user facing)
  • Feature (user facing) ⚠️ Your PR must target the refactor branch
  • Codebase improvement (dev facing)
  • Meta improvement to the project (dev facing)

Description of the changes in your PR

APK testing

The APK can be found by going to the "Checks" tab below the title. On the left pane, click on "CI", scroll down to "artifacts" and click "app" to download the zip file which contains the debug APK of this PR. You can find more info and a video demonstration on this wiki page.

Due diligence

Based on changes from refactor branch for code parity

Signed-off-by: Aayush Gupta <[email protected]>
Based on changes from refactor

Signed-off-by: Aayush Gupta <[email protected]>
@theimpulson theimpulson requested review from Stypox and TobiGr February 21, 2026 08:52
@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/giant PRs with more than 750 changed lines label Feb 21, 2026
@theimpulson theimpulson changed the title MIgrate from Picasso to Coil Migrate from Picasso to Coil Feb 21, 2026
@theimpulson
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

We should do a merge from dev to refactor after this. Then I will do a new PR to add SPDX copyright to files touched by this PR to avoid conflicts and simplify things.

@TobiGr TobiGr added dependency Issues and PRs related to dependencies codequality Improvements to the codebase to improve the code quality backport labels Feb 21, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@TobiGr TobiGr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. I tested the different image quality options with different network settings and everything seems to be working fine. Did you face any conflicts or difficulties while porting the changes back? If not, I'd feel free to merge. I don't think we need to review the code again. I'd just have a closer look if you needed to make some modifications to the originial version.

@theimpulson
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Did you face any conflicts or difficulties while porting the changes back?

Not much. Most conflicts were due to migration split into different PRs and lint changes that were done recently.

@theimpulson theimpulson merged commit 9f193a3 into TeamNewPipe:dev Feb 22, 2026
7 checks passed
@theimpulson theimpulson deleted the coilport branch February 22, 2026 02:35
@TobiGr TobiGr mentioned this pull request Feb 28, 2026
1 task
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport codequality Improvements to the codebase to improve the code quality dependency Issues and PRs related to dependencies size/giant PRs with more than 750 changed lines

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants