Modified ReferenceField validation to accept instances of ObjectId. #903
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
to_python already works with ObjectId with or without the dbref flag.
Member
|
ping @justingiorgi |
|
|
Author
|
I'll add a couple test cases for this and update the pull request. |
Member
|
Superseded by #1195 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Setting reference field to an object id by attribute was failing validation but setting when initializing the document functioned. I allowed ObjectId to pass validation. to_python already works with ObjectId with or without the dbref flag and all tests pass with this change.
This corrects issue #902.