refactor: Join-split example Part 1 by codygunton · Pull Request #4965 · AztecProtocol/aztec-packages

codygunton · 2024-03-05T19:04:03Z

The first of a two-part series to refactor the join-split example, the goal being to focus the tests on circuit writing (no proof construction), update them to reflect our newer idioms, and relocate them. Key changes

Keep a subset of tests relating to circuit writing.
Remove code that has to do with proof construction.
Add a new circuit change detection paradigm: rather than hashing a verification key (a proving system-dependent object), simply hash the circuit-defining data in the circuit builder.
Delete unused code (some unused before, some unused now).

The next PR #5016 will move and condense files, and update namespaces.

AztecBot · 2024-03-05T19:49:08Z

Benchmark results

Metrics with a significant change:

note_trial_decrypting_time_in_ms (8): 6.97 (-94%)

Detailed results

All benchmarks are run on txs on the Benchmarking contract on the repository. Each tx consists of a batch call to create_note and increment_balance, which guarantees that each tx has a private call, a nested private call, a public call, and a nested public call, as well as an emitted private note, an unencrypted log, and public storage read and write.

This benchmark source data is available in JSON format on S3 here.

Values are compared against data from master at commit 6522738a and shown if the difference exceeds 1%.

L2 block published to L1

Each column represents the number of txs on an L2 block published to L1.

Metric	8 txs	32 txs	64 txs
l1_rollup_calldata_size_in_bytes	5,700	18,884	36,452
l1_rollup_calldata_gas	66,516	239,336	470,036
l1_rollup_execution_gas	194,464	500,642	909,294
l2_block_processing_time_in_ms	1,188 (-1%)	4,474	8,902 (-1%)
note_successful_decrypting_time_in_ms	200 (+1%)	543	992 (-1%)
note_trial_decrypting_time_in_ms	⚠️ 6.97 (-94%)	60.3 (-5%)	127 (-2%)
l2_block_building_time_in_ms	16,677 (+2%)	69,958 (+5%)	139,051 (+4%)
l2_block_rollup_simulation_time_in_ms	12,719 (+2%)	53,409 (+5%)	106,205 (+4%)
l2_block_public_tx_process_time_in_ms	3,926 (+2%)	16,479 (+4%)	32,719 (+3%)

L2 chain processing

Each column represents the number of blocks on the L2 chain where each block has 16 txs.

Metric	5 blocks	10 blocks
node_history_sync_time_in_ms	13,592 (-3%)	27,340 (-1%)
note_history_successful_decrypting_time_in_ms	1,244 (+1%)	2,409 (+2%)
note_history_trial_decrypting_time_in_ms	90.2 (+47%)	147 (+36%)
node_database_size_in_bytes	18,808,912	35,586,128
pxe_database_size_in_bytes	29,923	59,478

Circuits stats

Stats on running time and I/O sizes collected for every circuit run across all benchmarks.

Circuit	circuit_simulation_time_in_ms	circuit_input_size_in_bytes	circuit_output_size_in_bytes
private-kernel-init	263 (+4%)	44,736	28,001
private-kernel-ordering	201 (+4%)	52,625	14,627
base-rollup	1,380 (+3%)	177,932	997
root-rollup	73.0	4,320	825
private-kernel-inner	335 (+4%)	73,715	28,001
public-kernel-app-logic	200 (+1%)	32,254	25,379
merge-rollup	8.73	2,840	997

Tree insertion stats

The duration to insert a fixed batch of leaves into each tree type.

Metric	1 leaves	2 leaves	8 leaves	16 leaves	32 leaves	64 leaves	128 leaves	512 leaves	1024 leaves	2048 leaves	4096 leaves
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_16_depth_ms	9.94 (+1%)	10.1 (-7%)	14.8 (-12%)	16.4 (+2%)	22.2 (+1%)	35.3 (-1%)	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_16_depth_hash_count	16.9	17.5	23.0	31.6	47.0	79.0	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_16_depth_hash_ms	0.577 (+1%)	0.562 (-7%)	0.631 (-11%)	0.507 (+2%)	0.465	0.440 (-1%)	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_32_depth_ms	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	46.4 (+2%)	72.0 (-1%)	230	443	869 (-1%)	1,730 (-1%)
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_32_depth_hash_count	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	96.0	159	543	1,055	2,079	4,127
batch_insert_into_append_only_tree_32_depth_hash_ms	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	0.476 (+2%)	0.445 (-1%)	0.420	0.415	0.413 (-1%)	0.414 (-1%)
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_20_depth_ms	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	54.1 (-2%)	107 (-1%)	339 (-1%)	659	1,313	2,604 (-1%)
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_20_depth_hash_count	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	104	207	691	1,363	2,707	5,395
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_20_depth_hash_ms	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	0.482 (-2%)	0.483 (-1%)	0.457 (-1%)	0.454	0.454 (-1%)	0.453 (-1%)
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_40_depth_ms	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	61.4 (+1%)	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_40_depth_hash_count	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	109	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
batch_insert_into_indexed_tree_40_depth_hash_ms	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	0.537 (+1%)	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Miscellaneous

Transaction sizes based on how many contracts are deployed in the tx.

Metric	0 deployed contracts
tx_size_in_bytes	19,179

Transaction processing duration by data writes.

Metric	0 new note hashes	1 new note hashes
tx_pxe_processing_time_ms	2,616	1,425 (+3%)

Metric	0 public data writes	1 public data writes
tx_sequencer_processing_time_ms	0.0292 (-2%)	486

This reverts commit a7672ab.

This reverts commit 8ae6a24.

codygunton · 2024-03-06T20:23:25Z

barretenberg/cpp/scripts/bb-tests.sh

  crypto_schnorr_tests
  crypto_sha256_tests
  ecc_tests
-  join_split_example_proofs_inner_proof_data_tests


Just a serialization tests, not worth illustrating (tests deleted too).

we have proper serialization tests elsewhere that tests what this test used to test?

codygunton · 2024-03-06T20:25:01Z

...nberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/join_split_example/proofs/notes/circuit/value/value_note.test.cpp

-
-    bool proof_result = verifier.verify_proof(proof);
-    EXPECT_EQ(proof_result, true);
+    EXPECT_EQ(CircuitChecker::check(builder), true);


Goal is to illustrate use of stdlib. In particular, no reason to generate proofs.

codygunton · 2024-03-06T22:53:15Z

barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/proof_system/circuit_builder/ultra_circuit_builder.cpp

 }

+template <typename Arithmetization> uint256_t UltraCircuitBuilder_<Arithmetization>::hash_circuit()
+{


Core change

do we not care about the other member variables in ultra_circuit_builder? like lookup tables and real_variable_tags and num_gates, etc...

lucasxia01 · 2024-03-07T18:16:40Z

barretenberg/barretenberg.code-workspace

    // Some settings can only be configured here.
    // The following are just provided as example.
    "settings": {
+        "files.associations": {


lucasxia01

Seems fine in general, but I'm not convinced we haven't lost testing functionality from deleting those tests. I'm also not sure about the hashing function being complete.

lucasxia01 · 2024-03-07T18:23:54Z

barretenberg/cpp/scripts/bb-tests.sh

  crypto_schnorr_tests
  crypto_sha256_tests
  ecc_tests
-  join_split_example_proofs_inner_proof_data_tests


we have proper serialization tests elsewhere that tests what this test used to test?

lucasxia01 · 2024-03-07T18:29:19Z

barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/proof_system/circuit_builder/ultra_circuit_builder.cpp

+        sum_of_block_sizes += block.size();
+    }
+
+    size_t num_bytes_in_selectors_and_variables = sizeof(FF) * Arithmetization::NUM_SELECTORS * sum_of_block_sizes;


doesn't look like this contains variables?

lucasxia01 · 2024-03-07T18:34:44Z

barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/proof_system/circuit_builder/ultra_circuit_builder.cpp

 }

+template <typename Arithmetization> uint256_t UltraCircuitBuilder_<Arithmetization>::hash_circuit()
+{


do we not care about the other member variables in ultra_circuit_builder? like lookup tables and real_variable_tags and num_gates, etc...

codygunton · 2024-03-08T17:10:00Z

@lucasxia01 made an issue to follow up on a particular question: AztecProtocol/barretenberg#900

🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- <details><summary>aztec-package: 0.26.6</summary> ## [0.26.6](aztec-package-v0.26.5...aztec-package-v0.26.6) (2024-03-08) ### Miscellaneous * **aztec-package:** Synchronize aztec-packages versions </details> <details><summary>barretenberg.js: 0.26.6</summary> ## [0.26.6](barretenberg.js-v0.26.5...barretenberg.js-v0.26.6) (2024-03-08) ### Miscellaneous * **barretenberg.js:** Synchronize aztec-packages versions </details> <details><summary>aztec-cli: 0.26.6</summary> ## [0.26.6](aztec-cli-v0.26.5...aztec-cli-v0.26.6) (2024-03-08) ### Features * Show bytecode size per function in CLI inspect-contract ([#5059](#5059)) ([cb9fdc6](cb9fdc6)) </details> <details><summary>aztec-packages: 0.26.6</summary> ## [0.26.6](aztec-packages-v0.26.5...aztec-packages-v0.26.6) (2024-03-08) ### Features * Basic public reverts ([#4870](#4870)) ([5cccc78](5cccc78)) * Deploying new inbox ([#5036](#5036)) ([fed729d](fed729d)) * Detect unknown note type ids in compute_note_hash ([#5086](#5086)) ([6206bec](6206bec)) * Easy deployment of protocol contracts in e2e ([#4983](#4983)) ([480161f](480161f)) * IPA documentation ([#4924](#4924)) ([48bd22e](48bd22e)) * Nullifier read requests in public kernel ([#4910](#4910)) ([0e44247](0e44247)) * Show bytecode size per function in CLI inspect-contract ([#5059](#5059)) ([cb9fdc6](cb9fdc6)) * Updating an SMT solver class ([#4981](#4981)) ([4b94d58](4b94d58)) ### Bug Fixes * Canonical contract address ([#5030](#5030)) ([b2af880](b2af880)) * Flaky deployment test ([#5035](#5035)) ([039eafc](039eafc)) * Pull the correct platform image for noir ([#5097](#5097)) ([3342371](3342371)) * Sleep function memory leak ([#5023](#5023)) ([a72cfea](a72cfea)), closes [#4817](#4817) * Storage v2 ([#5027](#5027)) ([fe3190e](fe3190e)) * Update protogalaxy cmake dependencies ([#5066](#5066)) ([507c374](507c374)) ### Miscellaneous * Address warnings in noir test suite ([#4966](#4966)) ([7ef4ef5](7ef4ef5)) * Bootstrap noir natively if nargo is invalid ([#5034](#5034)) ([df089de](df089de)) * Build avm transpiler if we are on mac ([#5039](#5039)) ([c2966b9](c2966b9)) * **ci:** Re-enable certain bb solidity ACIR tests ([#5065](#5065)) ([58e1ff4](58e1ff4)) * Cleanup of prover and verifier instances ([#4959](#4959)) ([f2fdefd](f2fdefd)) * Delete bootstrap scripts from `noir/noir-repo` ([#5044](#5044)) ([add91ca](add91ca)) * Disable `hello_world_example` noir test in aztec-packages CI ([#5061](#5061)) ([1be9243](1be9243)) * Join-split example Part 1 ([#4965](#4965)) ([b9de0f5](b9de0f5)) * Moving RootRollupInputs impl ([#5087](#5087)) ([f3d9f9b](f3d9f9b)) * Remove eccvm functionality to update the op queue and ensure ultra ops are populated through function ([#5084](#5084)) ([77954ab](77954ab)) ### Documentation * Parity circuit naming fixes ([#5076](#5076)) ([c255255](c255255)) </details> <details><summary>barretenberg: 0.26.6</summary> ## [0.26.6](barretenberg-v0.26.5...barretenberg-v0.26.6) (2024-03-08) ### Features * IPA documentation ([#4924](#4924)) ([48bd22e](48bd22e)) * Updating an SMT solver class ([#4981](#4981)) ([4b94d58](4b94d58)) ### Bug Fixes * Storage v2 ([#5027](#5027)) ([fe3190e](fe3190e)) * Update protogalaxy cmake dependencies ([#5066](#5066)) ([507c374](507c374)) ### Miscellaneous * **ci:** Re-enable certain bb solidity ACIR tests ([#5065](#5065)) ([58e1ff4](58e1ff4)) * Cleanup of prover and verifier instances ([#4959](#4959)) ([f2fdefd](f2fdefd)) * Join-split example Part 1 ([#4965](#4965)) ([b9de0f5](b9de0f5)) * Remove eccvm functionality to update the op queue and ensure ultra ops are populated through function ([#5084](#5084)) ([77954ab](77954ab)) </details> --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

Flatten join_split_example/ and move inside of examples/ Follows: #4965

🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- <details><summary>aztec-package: 0.26.6</summary> ## [0.26.6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@aztec-package-v0.26.5...aztec-package-v0.26.6) (2024-03-08) ### Miscellaneous * **aztec-package:** Synchronize aztec-packages versions </details> <details><summary>barretenberg.js: 0.26.6</summary> ## [0.26.6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@barretenberg.js-v0.26.5...barretenberg.js-v0.26.6) (2024-03-08) ### Miscellaneous * **barretenberg.js:** Synchronize aztec-packages versions </details> <details><summary>aztec-cli: 0.26.6</summary> ## [0.26.6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@aztec-cli-v0.26.5...aztec-cli-v0.26.6) (2024-03-08) ### Features * Show bytecode size per function in CLI inspect-contract ([#5059](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5059)) ([cb9fdc6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@cb9fdc6)) </details> <details><summary>aztec-packages: 0.26.6</summary> ## [0.26.6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@aztec-packages-v0.26.5...aztec-packages-v0.26.6) (2024-03-08) ### Features * Basic public reverts ([#4870](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4870)) ([5cccc78](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@5cccc78)) * Deploying new inbox ([#5036](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5036)) ([fed729d](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@fed729d)) * Detect unknown note type ids in compute_note_hash ([#5086](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5086)) ([6206bec](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@6206bec)) * Easy deployment of protocol contracts in e2e ([#4983](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4983)) ([480161f](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@480161f)) * IPA documentation ([#4924](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4924)) ([48bd22e](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@48bd22e)) * Nullifier read requests in public kernel ([#4910](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4910)) ([0e44247](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@0e44247)) * Show bytecode size per function in CLI inspect-contract ([#5059](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5059)) ([cb9fdc6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@cb9fdc6)) * Updating an SMT solver class ([#4981](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4981)) ([4b94d58](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@4b94d58)) ### Bug Fixes * Canonical contract address ([#5030](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5030)) ([b2af880](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@b2af880)) * Flaky deployment test ([#5035](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5035)) ([039eafc](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@039eafc)) * Pull the correct platform image for noir ([#5097](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5097)) ([3342371](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@3342371)) * Sleep function memory leak ([#5023](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5023)) ([a72cfea](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@a72cfea)), closes [#4817](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4817) * Storage v2 ([#5027](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5027)) ([fe3190e](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@fe3190e)) * Update protogalaxy cmake dependencies ([#5066](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5066)) ([507c374](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@507c374)) ### Miscellaneous * Address warnings in noir test suite ([#4966](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4966)) ([7ef4ef5](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@7ef4ef5)) * Bootstrap noir natively if nargo is invalid ([#5034](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5034)) ([df089de](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@df089de)) * Build avm transpiler if we are on mac ([#5039](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5039)) ([c2966b9](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@c2966b9)) * **ci:** Re-enable certain bb solidity ACIR tests ([#5065](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5065)) ([58e1ff4](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e1ff4)) * Cleanup of prover and verifier instances ([#4959](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4959)) ([f2fdefd](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@f2fdefd)) * Delete bootstrap scripts from `noir/noir-repo` ([#5044](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5044)) ([add91ca](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@add91ca)) * Disable `hello_world_example` noir test in aztec-packages CI ([#5061](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5061)) ([1be9243](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@1be9243)) * Join-split example Part 1 ([#4965](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4965)) ([b9de0f5](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@b9de0f5)) * Moving RootRollupInputs impl ([#5087](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5087)) ([f3d9f9b](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@f3d9f9b)) * Remove eccvm functionality to update the op queue and ensure ultra ops are populated through function ([#5084](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5084)) ([77954ab](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@77954ab)) ### Documentation * Parity circuit naming fixes ([#5076](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5076)) ([c255255](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@c255255)) </details> <details><summary>barretenberg: 0.26.6</summary> ## [0.26.6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@barretenberg-v0.26.5...barretenberg-v0.26.6) (2024-03-08) ### Features * IPA documentation ([#4924](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4924)) ([48bd22e](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@48bd22e)) * Updating an SMT solver class ([#4981](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4981)) ([4b94d58](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@4b94d58)) ### Bug Fixes * Storage v2 ([#5027](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5027)) ([fe3190e](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@fe3190e)) * Update protogalaxy cmake dependencies ([#5066](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5066)) ([507c374](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@507c374)) ### Miscellaneous * **ci:** Re-enable certain bb solidity ACIR tests ([#5065](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5065)) ([58e1ff4](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@58e1ff4)) * Cleanup of prover and verifier instances ([#4959](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4959)) ([f2fdefd](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@f2fdefd)) * Join-split example Part 1 ([#4965](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4965)) ([b9de0f5](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@b9de0f5)) * Remove eccvm functionality to update the op queue and ensure ultra ops are populated through function ([#5084](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#5084)) ([77954ab](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@77954ab)) </details> --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

Flatten join_split_example/ and move inside of examples/ Follows: AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4965

codygunton self-assigned this Mar 5, 2024

codygunton added 17 commits March 6, 2024 18:39

Remove unused function

5fdb0b4

Delete more unused functions

a2081d9

Tweak tests to make them work without proof construction

18edf3d

Remove more proof construction functions

472967c

More unused stuff

f37afd5

No vk

e5de97c

New circuit hashing.

9c4fd5d

Refactor value_note test

26201cb

Remove unused file

f01e70d

Create issue for security todo

2526f36

C++ syntax highlighting for .tcc

226baf3

Use RelWithAssert

a7672ab

New circuit hasing strategy

cc40461

Rename to reasonable names

616dd96

Remove unused setup

72c7b26

Test rename

d83be4b

Move new code to CircuitChecker

1bba00e

codygunton force-pushed the cg/js-split branch from 58aa564 to 1bba00e Compare March 6, 2024 18:51

codygunton added 8 commits March 6, 2024 19:32

Revert "Use RelWithAssert"

5a9c66e

This reverts commit a7672ab.

Remove ref to deleted binary

73191f8

Rename fingerprint

e541682

Revert alias change

12ce348

Does CI catch the bad hash?

8ae6a24

Remove vk reference

0fc045c

Revert "Does CI catch the bad hash?"

29cb863

This reverts commit 8ae6a24.

Consts

30253c9

codygunton changed the title ~~refactor: Join-split example and versioning~~ refactor: Join-split refactor 1 and versioning Mar 6, 2024

codygunton changed the title ~~refactor: Join-split refactor 1 and versioning~~ refactor: Join-split refactor 1 Mar 6, 2024

Cleanup dependencies

398eb20

codygunton changed the title ~~refactor: Join-split refactor 1~~ refactor: Join-split Part 1 Mar 6, 2024

codygunton changed the title ~~refactor: Join-split Part 1~~ refactor: Join-split example Part 1 Mar 6, 2024

codygunton marked this pull request as ready for review March 6, 2024 23:05

codygunton added 2 commits March 6, 2024 23:30

Remove unused header

ed8af4d

No relative pathing

7a5b9cc

codygunton mentioned this pull request Mar 7, 2024

refactor: Join-split example Part 2 #5016

Merged

codygunton commented Mar 7, 2024

View reviewed changes

lucasxia01 reviewed Mar 7, 2024

View reviewed changes

Rename variable for clarity

ca178da

Rumata888 approved these changes Mar 8, 2024

View reviewed changes

codygunton merged commit b9de0f5 into master Mar 8, 2024

codygunton deleted the cg/js-split branch March 8, 2024 17:18

AztecBot mentioned this pull request Mar 8, 2024

chore(master): Release 0.26.6 #5037

Merged

codygunton added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2024

refactor: Join-split example Part 2 (#5016)

0718320

Flatten join_split_example/ and move inside of examples/ Follows: #4965

AztecBot pushed a commit to AztecProtocol/barretenberg that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2024

refactor: Join-split example Part 2 (#5016)

fa983d0

Flatten join_split_example/ and move inside of examples/ Follows: AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#4965

Conversation

codygunton commented Mar 5, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

AztecBot commented Mar 5, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Benchmark results

L2 block published to L1

L2 chain processing

Circuits stats

Tree insertion stats

Miscellaneous

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

lucasxia01 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codygunton commented Mar 8, 2024

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

4 participants

codygunton commented Mar 5, 2024 •

edited

Loading

AztecBot commented Mar 5, 2024 •

edited

Loading