-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 595
feat: use msgpack for ClientIvc::Proof in API #12911
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
21 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ca0ef02
WiP experiemnt w msgpack for civc proof
ledwards2225 ccd4932
write and read from file in test
ledwards2225 2ecc4c1
encapsulte msgpak boilerplate in methods; need a better home
ledwards2225 971ed35
Merge branch 'master' into lde/msgpck_civc_proof
ledwards2225 64e41a7
clarify some things with coments
ledwards2225 e27b007
Phil's example
PhilWindle adfbe18
Throw something
codygunton 36bc543
Failure time goes from 21s to instantaneous
codygunton 3580c76
Try success full test
codygunton a484f5b
Merge commit '5b064bcc6eb347dd53ad3870fe0486792d2f79bb' into lde/msgp…
codygunton 3c9f520
Don't throw in WASM setting
codygunton e591165
Align prove_tube
codygunton d4b8e47
fix build
ledwards2225 ba96cdf
fix error type in bberg test
ledwards2225 07cf0b7
Merge branch 'master' into lde/msgpck_civc_proof
ledwards2225 ed5d1c6
use msgpack in write arb proof flow
ledwards2225 3e10aac
test cleanup
ledwards2225 81dc518
reinstate phil example
ledwards2225 ca7e255
use throw or abort and remove ts changes
ledwards2225 5b10e01
remove missed lines
ledwards2225 982b33c
add issue with note for immediate follow on
ledwards2225 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suspect that this didn't add any new headers (but also in general this should be in a cpp file as msgpack stuff that isn't our thin header include should avoid header pollution)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah I definitely don't want this in here. When you're back we should discuss how to standardize things, assuming we move to more msgpack use in general. I saw you had some established patterns using
msgpack::packer- maybe this can just fit into that but wasn't sure it was the right thing