Skip to content

Conversation

@terabytesoftw
Copy link
Member

@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw commented Jun 30, 2025

Q A
Is bugfix? ✔️
New feature?
Breaks BC?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new model with strict validation rules for tree nodes, enforcing required fields, minimum name length, and capitalization.
  • Tests
    • Added tests to verify the behavior of appending nodes with and without validation, ensuring correct handling of validation states and database persistence.
  • Chores
    • Updated configuration to support the new strictly validated tree model in testing tools.

…es. Update tests to include validation scenarios for `appendTo` method.
@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw added the bug Something isn't working label Jun 30, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 30, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@terabytesoftw has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 10 minutes and 20 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1d6661e and c5db832.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php (2 hunks)

Walkthrough

A new model class with strict validation rules was introduced, and corresponding tests were added to verify the behavior of the appendTo method when using the runValidation parameter. The PHPStan configuration was updated to recognize the new model, and the test suite was extended to ensure validation is correctly enforced or skipped.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
tests/support/model/TreeWithStrictValidation.php Added new TreeWithStrictValidation class with strict validation rules for the name property.
tests/NestedSetsQueryBehaviorTest.php Added test for appendTo with strict validation and runValidation parameter; updated imports.
tests/phpstan-config.php Updated to include TreeWithStrictValidation in PHPStan behavior mapping and imports.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Test as NestedSetsQueryBehaviorTest
    participant Model as TreeWithStrictValidation
    participant DB as Database

    Test->>Model: Create invalid node (invalid name)
    Test->>Model: appendTo(parent, runValidation=true)
    Model->>Model: Validate (fails)
    Model-->>Test: Returns false, has errors

    Test->>Model: Create another invalid node
    Test->>Model: appendTo(parent, runValidation=false)
    Model->>Model: Skip validation
    Model->>DB: Persist node
    Model-->>Test: Returns true, no errors
Loading

Possibly related PRs

  • yii2-extensions/nested-sets-behavior#24: Both PRs involve the appendTo method, but this related PR focuses on refreshing node state and left/right attribute correctness, while the current PR tests validation behavior.

Poem

In the garden of tests, a new tree stands tall,
With rules so strict, it challenges all.
Validation toggled, true or not,
Ensuring behaviors are perfectly caught.
A hop, a skip, a test well done—
Another day’s work for this coding bun! 🐇🌳

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 30, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (935d973) to head (c5db832).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##                main       #25   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage     100.00%   100.00%           
  Complexity        90        90           
===========================================
  Files              2         2           
  Lines            469       469           
===========================================
  Hits             469       469           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
tests/NestedSetsQueryBehaviorTest.php (1)

74-125: Comprehensive test coverage for appendTo validation scenarios.

The test method effectively validates both code paths of the appendTo method - with and without validation enabled. The test logic correctly uses invalid data ('x') that fails the strict validation rules (minimum length 5 and uppercase first letter) to verify the expected behavior in each scenario.

However, consider improving the assertion message clarity:

-        self::assertNotNull(
-            $persistedNode,
-            "Node with ID '{$persistedNode?->id}' should exist after appending to target node.",
-        );
+        self::assertNotNull(
+            $persistedNode,
+            "Node should exist in database after appending to target node with validation disabled.",
+        );
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 935d973 and 1d6661e.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • tests/NestedSetsQueryBehaviorTest.php (2 hunks)
  • tests/phpstan-config.php (2 hunks)
  • tests/support/model/TreeWithStrictValidation.php (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: terabytesoftw
PR: yii2-extensions/nested-sets-behavior#13
File: src/NestedSetsBehavior.php:145-145
Timestamp: 2025-06-29T11:22:41.839Z
Learning: The user terabytesoftw prefers to keep PRs focused and small, implementing enhancements in separate dedicated PRs rather than bundling multiple changes together.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)
tests/support/model/TreeWithStrictValidation.php (1)
tests/support/model/Tree.php (1)
  • Tree (17-64)
tests/NestedSetsQueryBehaviorTest.php (4)
tests/support/model/Tree.php (1)
  • Tree (17-64)
tests/support/model/TreeWithStrictValidation.php (1)
  • TreeWithStrictValidation (14-24)
tests/TestCase.php (1)
  • generateFixtureTree (168-202)
src/NestedSetsBehavior.php (1)
  • appendTo (294-306)
🪛 PHPMD (2.15.0)
tests/NestedSetsQueryBehaviorTest.php

78-78: Avoid using static access to class '\yii2\extensions\nestedsets\tests\support\model\Tree' in method 'testAppendToWithRunValidationParameterUsingStrictValidation'. (Clean Code Rules)

(StaticAccess)


114-114: Avoid using static access to class '\yii2\extensions\nestedsets\tests\support\model\TreeWithStrictValidation' in method 'testAppendToWithRunValidationParameterUsingStrictValidation'. (Clean Code Rules)

(StaticAccess)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.2-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/support/model/TreeWithStrictValidation.php (1)

14-24: Well-designed strict validation model for testing purposes.

The TreeWithStrictValidation class effectively extends the base Tree model with comprehensive validation rules that will enable thorough testing of validation scenarios. The three-tiered validation approach (required, minimum length, pattern matching) with custom error messages provides good coverage for testing different validation failure cases.

tests/phpstan-config.php (1)

7-13: Proper PHPStan configuration update for the new model.

The configuration correctly adds TreeWithStrictValidation to both the import statement and behavior mapping, following the established pattern for other model classes in the project.

Also applies to: 35-37

@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw requested a review from Copilot June 30, 2025 09:41
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds a new TreeWithStrictValidation model enforcing stronger name validation rules and updates tests and configuration to cover appendTo() behavior with validation enabled or skipped.

  • Introduce TreeWithStrictValidation subclass with required, min-length, and uppercase-start rules
  • Register the new model in phpstan-config.php for correct behavior typing
  • Add tests in NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php covering appendTo() with and without validation

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
tests/support/model/TreeWithStrictValidation.php New model subclass defining strict name validation rules
tests/phpstan-config.php Added import and behavior mapping for TreeWithStrictValidation
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php New test method for appendTo() under strict validation scenarios
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php:1797

  • Consider adding a positive test case where a valid name (e.g., starting uppercase and at least 5 characters) is used with runValidation=true to assert appendTo() returns true, has no errors, and persists the node.
        $invalidNode = new TreeWithStrictValidation(['name' => 'x']);

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants